Comments

[hidden]

an Obvious SamYang/SamDoesArt model , if you go through this person's other upload's solely of this person , you can't mistake the obviousness (posts/10782441)
is there a process to marking an "artist" as ai-gen'd here , because I'd happily be the undertaker .

[hidden]

akkay12 said in comment #2579612:

an Obvious SamYang/SamDoesArt model , if you go through this person's other upload's solely of this person , you can't mistake the obviousness (posts/10782441)
is there a process to marking an "artist" as ai-gen'd here , because I'd happily be the undertaker .

Well, I understand that my drawings really resemble SamYang's work—I won't hide the fact that I deeply admire this artist and try to follow his style as much as my abilities allow. I also admit that I am not an outstanding or the most original artist, I use references and make mistakes. However, I do this mainly for my own pleasure and do not try to deceive people in any way. As for this and other drawings you mentioned, I can provide PSD files or screenshots with layers that prove that this was created not by AI but by hand.

[hidden]

ElGranFracaso said in comment #2584237:

If I find time today, maybe I'll decode the faint text in the background from the hex...

Good catch. Didn't know there was another hex sequence on the background.

Anyways, it says:

CENSOR THIS

THIS IS ME BEING KIND

SHIWU IS BACK
Hex
43 45 4E 53 4F 52 20 54 48 49 53

54 48 49 53 20 49 53 20 4D 45 20 42
45 49 4E 47 20 4B 49 4E 44

53 48 49 57 55 20 49 53 20 42 41 43 4B
[hidden]

Kicchou Yachie said:

我的天哪

CN: "Oh my god!"

So, apparently she's Triad instead of Yakuza, huh.

Speaking of, Kicchou Yachie's name gets really "funny" in Chinese if one accidentally misreads it and swaps two characters around...

吉八弔千慧

[hidden]

thefoxne said in comment #2584296:

If subsequent posts are related or contain relevant content, don't re-pool them; instead, re-pool them into the old posts.I'll edit your pool later.

Were you trying to say they should be parented instead of pooled? Because pooling large variant sets like this is perfectly acceptable.

[hidden]

WRS said in comment #2584317:

I changed the parents because it's more artifacted. Not like I haven't mentioned checking for artifacts before or anything here.

This is a bad example to complain about. They have the same artifacts and look nearly identical. The only difference I could find is that the colored lines near Cyrene's left hand might be brighter in one than the other. If you think users should be able to tell the difference between these two, you should tell them where to look.

That said, the other one probably should be the parent since the quality is about even and it was posted first.

[hidden]

It's not even complaining. It'd be one thing if it was a different user. This user is in the Discord and has been privy to countless discussions and questions about 1ups based on artifacts and filesize, the latter of which isn't necessarily a determining factor of superiority. A script has even been suggested regarding this. The artifacts are more noticeable on this one but because the chromatic aberration makes them stand out more.

There might be some colour profile-related happening here though. There might be a valid case for the previous parenting. But come on. Since when was clarifying an edit complaining?

Updated by WRS