Might be AI but not sure
Posted under General
Might be AI but not sure
WoodyTheFemboy said:
Might be AI but not sure
It definitely is; the belt buckle and the collar are the most egregious offenders.
Getting AI vibes unlike other posts by this artist before or after. Hands, eyes, hair, eyebrows, all usual places that give AI tells look off.
8253803 said:
Getting AI vibes unlike other posts by this artist before or after. Hands, eyes, hair, eyebrows, all usual places that give AI tells look off.
I think there's human involvement; the fish logo on the one shirt, the paws, the collars, and the hair ornaments look human to me. They all lack the line melting you get with AI. The hair does look suspicious though. It's hard to say for sure, but I think these could be ai-assisted. Edit: I could definitely use a second opinion; I'm not confident about it.
This ai? post #9644104
post #8836652Anyone wanna be a "mod" and pass judgment on this artist?
Updated by ion288
ion288 said:
post #8836652
Anyone wanna be a "mod" and pass judgment on this artist?
This sounds like a load of BS, no AI artefacts in the post and it's a well established artist whose posts from 5 years ago don't look much different from how they draw currently, so I'm just going to reject it.
ai-tracker said:
This ai? post #9644104
I can see layers of brushstrokes. This looks human to me.
Placeholder1996 said:
I think there's human involvement; the fish logo on the one shirt, the paws, the collars, and the hair ornaments look human to me. They all lack the line melting you get with AI. The hair does look suspicious though. It's hard to say for sure, but I think these could be ai-assisted. Edit: I could definitely use a second opinion; I'm not confident about it.
I'll add ai-assisted tag for now
Is this person tracing over AI?
What's the verdict on twistedscarlett? I've heard they use ai but none of their work is tagged as such.
Placeholder1996 said:
I think there's human involvement; the fish logo on the one shirt, the paws, the collars, and the hair ornaments look human to me. They all lack the line melting you get with AI. The hair does look suspicious though. It's hard to say for sure, but I think these could be ai-assisted. Edit: I could definitely use a second opinion; I'm not confident about it.
post #6270701 the hand on the left of the image is ai. there's nail coloring in the skin of one of the fingers. also, both images have weird nails, like they're too long or they don't understand how nails work.
ai-tracker said:
What's the verdict on twistedscarlett? I've heard they use ai but none of their work is tagged as such.
I know they've posted "experiments with AI" results on Patreon before. Shading like this plus their history make it suspicious, but not proven beyond reasonable doubt.
ai-tracker said:
post #6270701 the hand on the left of the image is ai. there's nail coloring in the skin of one of the fingers. also, both images have weird nails, like they're too long or they don't understand how nails work.
Agreed, it could be ai-generated with insufficient touch-up work from the artist.