[APPROVED] Tag implication: locker_room -> locker

Posted under Tags

Hillside_Moose said:

I think those two examples are better off tagged changing_room.

Since this request is still from me, I also wanted to say something to this and I have to agree that those posts should be tagged with changing_room instead.
I mean...you can only call a room a locker_room if it has lockers...And I'm not aware of exceptions in this ase in the language.

I've done a quick clean up the of the locker_room tag and approved this implication. Of note I've also purged posts of shoe_lockers from the tag, with the majority either being open (no door) or lift up type doors. If people wish to include shoe lockers (which are generally located at the entrance way, and not in a separate room) under the locker room tag, that can be a separate discussion.

Hillside_Moose said:

I think those two examples are better off tagged changing_room.

I went ahead and changed post #175562 to changing room. I removed the tag without replacement for post #439726, because the object present in the room is a storage cabinet and that gives us no details on the type of room they're in. It could be a storage room, a club room, or even the infirmary, given how little information that actually provides us.

Chiera said:

I mean...you can only call a room a locker_room if it has lockers...And I'm not aware of exceptions in this ase in the language.

Problem is what people call a locker. Going by a google search, storage units similar to post #175562 for hanging coats are labeled as a "coat locker", but there's no door or lock to them. At least during my time in elementary school they were common as the place for kids to hang their coats and backpacks, but I don't recall them ever being called a "locker".

In general for the locker tag, I would support requiring that they actually have a door or similar cover.

1