[REJECTED] Tag implication: single_over-kneehigh -> over-kneehighs

create implication single_over-kneehigh -> over-kneehighs

Link to implication

Similar tags such as single kneehigh implicating kneehighs also exist.

EDIT: This tag implication is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The tag implication single_over-kneehigh -> over-kneehighs (forum #151438) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

There are only 34 posts total and only 6 in the last year from single over-kneehigh. Either populate it more and let the above implication stand, or just tag those instances manually for now.

Wait, wait, wait... we actually have an over-kneehighs tag??

I mean, talk about splitting hairs.
Now that i know about it, i'd more rather just alias over-kneehighs to thighhighs and single_over-kneehigh to single_thighhigh.

keonas said:

Wait, wait, wait... we actually have an over-kneehighs tag??

I mean, talk about splitting hairs.
Now that i know about it, i'd more rather just alias over-kneehighs to thighhighs and single_over-kneehigh to single_thighhigh.

I'd say the tag still deserves to stay but I'm not feeling particularly strong about it.

This tag implication is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The tag implication single_over-kneehigh -> over-kneehighs (forum #151438) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.