[REJECTED] Tag implication: open_track_jacket -> open_jacket

tag implication #9205 open_track_jacket -> open_jacket has been rejected.

Reason: Has 232 posts and doesn't implicate open jacket or open clothes.

EDIT: The tag implication open_track_jacket -> open_jacket (forum #156699) has been rejected by @Unbreakable.

Why do we even have open track jacket? Why not just track jacket + open jacket?

As a general rule, I think secondary tags like open jacket, holding jacket, torn jacket, naked coat, etc shouldn't be subdivided further. Secondary tags shouldn't replicate the full hierarchy of the primary tag.

Otherwise it leads to an explosion of very specific tags (think: open hooded jacket, open military jacket, open letterman jacket, open bomber jacket, etc) and deep implication hierarchies (imagine having open hooded track jacket -> open track jacket -> open jacket -> open clothes).

I was considering the fact we have tags such as open blazer which implicates open jacket and has 2257 posts.

Blazer colors got aliased away in topic #14959. Open blazer should have followed suit. There was some support for it at the time.

忍猫 said:

I was considering the fact we have tags such as open blazer which implicates open jacket and has 2257 posts.

Unless I'm misreading topic #14959, that may only be due to an oversight. Open_blazer and sleeveless_blazer were on the list of tags @keonas compiled for aliasing, but for some reason they were left out of the bulk update.

EDIT: Ninja'd.

Thanks @evazion and @iridescent_slime for clearing that up! This implication should be rejected.

The tag implication open_track_jacket -> open_jacket (forum #156699) has been rejected by @Unbreakable.

I like the open blazer tag since it adds both blazer and open jacket but yeah, it should probably be aliased.