[REJECTED] Tag implication: restraints -> restrained

tag implication #9264 restraints -> restrained has been rejected.

Reason: Characters in restraints are by definition restrained.

EDIT: The tag implication restraints -> restrained (forum #158156) has been rejected by @NWF_Renim.

Alas, I was wrong here. After looking through more posts, restaints is sometimes used without a character physically being restrained at that moment. For instance, when another character is coming at them to restrain them, or when restraints are shown before a character is put in them.

Protip: before submitting an implication request, search for counterexamples. It doesn't take long to find whether your idea was a good one.

The tag implication restraints -> restrained (forum #158156) has been rejected by @NWF_Renim.