Posted under Tags
Something I've been wondering for a while, when should animated (and similar) posts be tagged with facing viewer in addition to looking at viewer? I know a simple blinking post should not be tagged with it because that would just be tag padding and not help anyone but I don't see why posts like post #4192429, post #3982101 and post #3913627 shouldn't be tagged with it since they would in a still image.
Thoughts?
I think that if something specific happens in an animated post, the tag should be added. If you can distinguish between the act of closing your eyes and blinking, I don't see why facing viewer shouldn't be added. I think a problem could be to determine how many seconds the eyes should be closed to be seen as closed eyes. Otherwise I don't see a problem with this.
Guaro1238 said:
I think that if something specific happens in an animated post, the tag should be added. If you can distinguish between the act of closing your eyes and blinking, I don't see why facing viewer shouldn't be added. I think a problem could be to determine how many seconds the eyes should be closed to be seen as closed eyes. Otherwise I don't see a problem with this.
I have the same opinion. If it's discernible as an individual action then it should be tagged. I wouldn't tag post #3982101 as facing viewer if it was just the first blink (but given the rest of the picture I would), but I would post #3913627 and post #4192429.
