What is the definition of "naked_kimono"? I would assume it's wearing a kimono (or yukata, or whatever) without any underwear whatsoever, but not all pictures tagged with it fit that.
Posted under General
Naked_kimono should be used for that, yes. If someone wears underwear under it, then it should be removed from that post.
ice73 said:
What if the pic only shows that the person is not wearing upper undergarments, while not showing if they are wearing, say, panties or whatever? That wouldn't fit anymore given the ambiguity, wouldn't it?
Yes, it would. Same reason you still tag someone as nude, not topless, even if only the upper body is visible.
Though isn't this how a kimono was traditionally meant to be worn? I mean granted likely in modern times people wear underwear with them, but it's a little like a hypothetical naked_kilt would be, isn't it?
Shinjidude said:
Though isn't this how a kimono was traditionally meant to be worn? I mean granted likely in modern times people wear underwear with them, but it's a little like a hypothetical naked_kilt would be, isn't it?
I dunno if that matters for the purpose of a tag and someone searching for the tag.
nonamethanks said:
Yes, it would. Same reason you still tag someone as nude, not topless, even if only the upper body is visible.
I don't think assuming someone is nude because their visible upper half is completely bare is the same as assuming someone isn't wearing panties because they're visibly not wearing a bra under their clothes.
blindVigil said:
I don't think assuming someone is nude because their visible upper half is completely bare is the same as assuming someone isn't wearing panties because they're visibly not wearing a bra under their clothes.
Consider post #4456473. If this does not fall under naked kimono then what is it?
I see a lot of results under kimono no_bra so admittedly it could fall under that, but the two tags have a lot of overlap. Another option would be to only use no_bra for pictures where the lower body is covered, but it's impossible to enforce unless someone wants to garden these tags forever.
nonamethanks said:
ice73 said:
What if the pic only shows that the person is not wearing upper undergarments, while not showing if they are wearing, say, panties or whatever? That wouldn't fit anymore given the ambiguity, wouldn't it?
Yes, it would. Same reason you still tag someone as nude, not topless, even if only the upper body is visible.
+1. naked_kimono describes a lack of clothes underneath a kimono. Even when you can only see half of the character, if that half has no clothing underneath the kimono then it applies.