I see some examples under otoko_no_ko male_cleavage that don't fit. Makes sense that male cleavage would only be for pectorals, but unfortunately the tag name invites mistags like that. Wouldn't it be better to rename the tag to pectoral_cleavage, if that's its purpose?
I see some examples under otoko_no_ko male_cleavage that don't fit. Makes sense that male cleavage would only be for pectorals, but unfortunately the tag name invites mistags like that. Wouldn't it be better to rename the tag to pectoral_cleavage, if that's its purpose?
That's not a bad suggestion. But I'm not very knowledgeable about otoko no ko content, so I'm not sure if my opinion matters much here. Those two examples look kinda like a mix of flat chest and manboobs I guess?
After Evazion pointed it out in forum #175997, I did suggest we create a tag for them or use flat chest for them as well in topic #18021. But I dropped the idea because nobody supported it.
Alternative. I think otoko no ko characters can just get the cleavage or pectoral cleavage tag depending on each picture, since they tend to be depicted in wildly different ways.
I think otoko no ko characters can just get the cleavage or pectoral cleavage tag depending on each picture, since they tend to be depicted in wildly different ways.
If we want to use cleavage with traps, we'll need to remove the cleavage -> breasts implication.
Well, otoko no ko characters sometimes are tagged with small breasts too (small_breasts otoko_no_ko solo), so I don't think it matters that much. It's just something we have to live with due to the absurdity of "draw a girl, call it a boy".
Basically, if the character has pectorals tag it pectoral cleavage, otherwise it's breasts and you tag it with just cleavage.
I'm supportive of this. Either way though, there are some examples under otoko_no_ko cleavage solo (and prolly some other non solos) that need gardening to change cleavage to pectoral_cleavage or remove it entirely.