Posted under General
I've seen several pictures that involve a girl's belly swelling due to large amounts of cum tagged as pregnant by now. Which by definition of the word/tag (having a fetus growing in a female's belly) is incorrect.
However, after some fiddling around, I didn't find a current cumbelly tag. How are these pictures supposed to be tagged?
Updated by Hecate-chan
I think he's referring to posts like post #280312 where it seems just a tad more than cum_inside.
homeless_homo said:
I think he's referring to posts like post #280312 where it seems just a tad more than cum_inside.
That's the one I was referring to. I agree that cumbelly isn't exactly the most apt word, but pregnant just doesn't fit for that. And I doubt that cum_inside does, either.
0xCCBA696 said:
It's still stupid, and I hope I never meet any of you irl.Also cum_inflation should describe semen inflating, not "bellies" inflating. Then again, this entire concept is so physically impossible that I find it hard to even think about.
I too hope not to meet you irl.
Also, cum_inflation obviously describes inflation *with* cum, not inflation *of* cum.
And, cum overflow is also completely impossible, yet is tagged. That such a thing is impossible does not make it less taggable.
Surprised to see this bumped after a year. I'm still sorry about suggesting 'cumbelly'. I agree that that is stupid. I'd prefer cum_inflation myself.
There's a 'inflation' tag now, and it does include some cum inflation pictures, but tagging with that seems quite haphazard at this point. Is that tag moderator endorsed? If yes, I'll see to getting some proper tagging done with that myself.
0xCCBA696: I'd consider cum actually being inflated as even less probable than cum-caused stomach inflation. If you want to be all grammar-nazi-ey, call it 'inflation_by_cum' or whatever. Though that strikes me as a little more clumsily worded than 'cum_inflation' would be.
And if you're going to oppose a tag with the argument being 'physically impossible', I think that's going to open a can of worms. What's next? Removing all existing tags that are physically impossible? Goo girls? Lamia? Futanari? Riiiight.
Hecate-chan said:
if you're going to oppose a tag with the argument being 'physically impossible'
I said that I find it hard to think about such concepts because they're so physically impossible, not that I'd oppose tagging them.
By the way, I think a major reason these tags are so inane is that we use "cum" instead of "semen". Seeing people want to be as correct as possible about tagging while at the same time using a highly vague word like "cum" is sort of incongruous.
0xCCBA696 said:
I said that I find it hard to think about such concepts because they're so physically impossible, not that I'd oppose tagging them.
I need to work on my reading comprehension, seriously.
0xCCBA696 said:
By the way, I think a major reason these tags are so inane is that we use "cum" instead of "semen". Seeing people want to be as correct as possible about tagging while at the same time using a highly vague word like "cum" is sort of incongruous.
That's something that bothers me, too, actually. I kept writing "semen" in my above post, then kept replacing it with "cum" afterwards since that's what the discussion was about, and because it's what is used everywhere else. 'semen' even is aliased to 'cum'. (While 'semen_inside' doesn't exist, and 'cum_inside' is widely used.)
Also, wow. Somehow I keep managing to write posts that sound perfectly logical to me when I write them, and come off as perfectly assholish even to me when I read them a day later. Argh.
