Holding implications

War6t2 said:

BUR #22996 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication holding_wreath -> holding
create implication holding_trophy -> trophy
create implication holding_trophy -> holding
create implication holding_clover -> clover
create implication holding_clover -> holding
create implication holding_mistletoe -> holding
create implication holding_telescope -> telescope
create implication holding_telescope -> holding
create implication holding_manga -> manga_(object)
create implication holding_manga -> holding
create implication holding_belt -> belt
create implication holding_belt -> holding
create implication holding_rabbit -> rabbit
create implication holding_rabbit -> holding_animal
create implication holding_ice_cream_cone -> ice_cream_cone
create implication holding_ice_cream_cone -> holding
create implication holding_rock -> rock
create implication holding_rock -> holding

Even more.

head_wreath does not imply wreath (topic #12612, topic #21820).

nonamethanks said:

head_wreath does not imply wreath (topic #12612, topic #21820).

Removed.

The bulk update request #22996 (forum #267459) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #22317 (forum #264631) has been rejected by @ehh.

BUR #23803 has been rejected.

it never ends

Only 6 of the 20 things in holding_tie -necktie are neckties. Of course, this could be cleaned out but that would reduce the tag to only 43 uses.

Several of the things in the tiny holding clock tag are actually pocket watches. Again could be cleaned out but would make the tag even smaller.

Would holding_bass_guitar not be a better name for holding_bass. Is such a tag needed or does the holding_guitar bass_guitar combo not suffice?

holding_planet -planet includes people holding moons and what appear to be people holding model globes.

MOST things in holding_limb recently are like post #6725957 and not disembodied limbs at all.

BUR #23806 has been rejected.

oh my god

[deleted]

Bougaiteuil said:

That tag is deprecated. You should probably actually look at the tags you're making BURs for.

Ah thanks, I was dealing with so many that slipped through the cracks.

What do we do with holding_footwear?

[deleted]

Bougaiteuil said:

Also bow (ornament) and foot wear aren't tags, and carton is called ambiguous in the wiki.

Those are fixed, see above.

skylightcrystal said:

Only 6 of the 20 things in holding_tie -necktie are neckties. Of course, this could be cleaned out but that would reduce the tag to only 43 uses.

Several of the things in the tiny holding clock tag are actually pocket watches. Again could be cleaned out but would make the tag even smaller.

Would holding_bass_guitar not be a better name for holding_bass. Is such a tag needed or does the holding_guitar bass_guitar combo not suffice?

holding_planet -planet includes people holding moons and what appear to be people holding model globes.

MOST things in holding_limb recently are like post #6725957 and not disembodied limbs at all.

accuracy > count imo. I'll clean those out when my eyes are not tired from staring at excel/word and dealing with this shit.

Wish we had a easier way to search for implied tags as searching implications by tag count appears to count the tag the are implied to rather than the holding_x tag itself. I had to to go through 300+ of the holding tags then change it to the correct format in words/excel, try it, copy paste the errors and format THEM to the same, color duplicates, sort for coloring and then remove duplicates via excel, then finally gather that in one BUR, starting with over 300 and ending up with 24. For the love of god tell me there is a better way.

[deleted]

Bougaiteuil said:

Sorry, I didn't see your edit. The wiki for unworn footwear says not to use it, so I would assume holding footwear should be sorted into holding shoes, holding boots, holding sandals, and holding slippers, the latter of which doesn't exist, but such items are mentioned in the unworn footwear wiki.

Not 100% sure what you mean by this, but you should be able to search implications by antecedent_tag[post_count] and consequent_tag[post_count] for either one you want.

I am fucking retarded.

WHERE did you put this?

https://danbooru.donmai.us/tag_implications?commit=Search&search[antecedent_name_matches]=holding_*+&search[order]=consequent_tag[post_count]

[deleted]

Bougaiteuil said:

They're search parameters, so e.g. https://danbooru.donmai.us/tag_implications?search%5Bconsequent_name_matches%5D=holding_*+&search%5Bconsequent_tag%5D%5Bpost_count%5D=10..1000.

If you meant order, then yes unfortunately it only sorts by the consequent count. You'd have to make an issue on GitHub about it.

Ah ok I'm slightly less retarded for not being able to figure out a way then, thanks.

War6t2 said:

Ah thanks, I was dealing with so many that slipped through the cracks.

drawing is also deprecated. drawing (object) is probably the one that wants to be implicated.

legwear is also deprecated with a note to not use the tag.

The bulk update request #22553 (forum #265680) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #23803 (forum #270856) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #23806 (forum #270872) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

Do not waste my time with giant BURs like these that have no thought put into them. If you make no effort when submitting them then I will spend no effort in approving them.