imply wiffle_gag -> ball_gag

BUR #19018 has been rejected.

create implication wiffle_gag -> ball_gag

Subset

What a coincidence, I was just tagging the 3000+ posts that were missing the wiffle_gag tag right now.
That might be fine as an implication, but there would be a catch, there are some posts that have a dildo gag that ends with a sphere/hemisphere with holes in it. It's not exactly a ball_gag (in fact I think some lack the tag), but imho it would fall under the wiffle tag given the breathing holes.
Maybe it's better to just imply wiffle_gag ->gag ?

Things like this: post #5082976

The bulk update request #19018 (forum #250495) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

BUR #19426 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication wiffle_gag -> gag

As above.

The bulk update request #19426 (forum #251977) has been approved by @nonamethanks.