Frankly, I cannot understand by what logic all the "bound_bodypart" tags are used (tag group:sexual positions - bondage specific), but to make things easier I will give an example with only the bound_legs.
So, in the bound_legs wiki we have: "Both legs bound together in any way with some sort of restraint."
Written like this, it seems to mean that both legs (left and right) must be bound together (like this post #6643840, or post #6640546, etc.)
The problem is that if that were the case, then the tag would be almost half full of incorrectly tagged posts, since the legs can also be bound individually, such as in the frogtie or things like post #4148136.
Then, I suppose that bound_legs is an umbrella tag to indicate "cases where legs are bound, either to each other or individually", but then the wiki definition would need to be modified.
And in such a case, to search for separate bound legs I can use the tag combination spread_legs bound_legs and for legs bound together the tag combination legs_together bound_legs and it would work. (although many posts need gardening).
But following this logic, since all the other bound_*bodypart tags have same types of wikis (two wrists bound together, two arms bound together, two feet bound togheter) and also they contain posts with arms, wrists, feet, etc. that are bound but NOT TOGETHER, i.e. they are treated as umbrella tags (like bound_legs), then how is it possible to differentiate bodypart bound separately and bodypart bound together?
Because in legs example we have like I said spread_legs and legs_together, but for the other body-parts those tags do not exist or are deprecated.
And the separated_tags (example: separated_legs have different meanings and cannot apply to situations like frogtie).
Another example: post #6643906 right now is tagged bound_legs, bound_wrists, because wrists and legs are indeed bound, but following wiki definition (wrists bound togethers and legs bound togethers) this tags cannot apply here, so how do you tag this post?
Can someone explain it to me?
Because if it is as I think, I would have some possible solutions.