BUR #20341 has been rejected.
create alias opened_by_another -> assisted_exposure
No obvious differences between them.
Posted under Tags
BUR #20341 has been rejected.
create alias opened_by_another -> assisted_exposure
No obvious differences between them.
If this is going to be an aliased, pulled_by_another and lifted_by_another would need to be aliased to be consistent. The wikis on those tags imply they are not the same, though, and that assisted_exposure should only also be tagged if intimate/genital areas are exposed. If that's the case, something like post #2482125 wouldn't count as "assisted exposure".
EB said:
If this is going to be an aliased, pulled_by_another and lifted_by_another would need to be aliased to be consistent. The wikis on those tags imply they are not the same, though, and that assisted_exposure should only also be tagged if intimate/genital areas are exposed. If that's the case, something like post #2482125 wouldn't count as "assisted exposure".
I wasn't aware of the other two tags. I also didn't notice the exceptions like your example post. I now agree there are some cases that would not fall under assisted exposure, though in practice its probably going to be hard to find them even if opened_by_another were better populated. Regardless, that's not enough to justify an alias and I would reject the BUR if it didn't get so many positive votes already. I will downvote it for now and wait to hear from those that still support the BUR if they have anything to say.
On a semi-related note, there seem to be quite a few posts that have at least one of those three "by another" tags and qualify for assisted exposure, but do not have the latter tag. We'll need to add them manually at some point if we reject the BUR.
Tangential, but my thoughts about *_by_another/self: forum #240003.
The bulk update request #20341 (forum #256265) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.