Imply T-34-85 to T-34

BUR #21227 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication t-34-85 -> t-34

The T-34-85 is a variant of the T-34 tank. Given that most posts with the T-34-85 were manually tagged with both the base T-34 and T-34-85, I think the tag should be implicated accordingly.

-1 for the implication.

I think it should be aliased into the main T-34 tag, despite I thought such over-specific tag should've been nuked instead. We do not even necessarily tag all the existing specific T-34 variants. In context of illustrations, the difference between T-34 variants left ignored and too trivial to be recognized by most people. They just call all of them as the T-34. Many artists struggle on rendering anatomy correctly, including vehicles and weapons.
While I consider the exceptionally distinct SU- variants should stay.

Anyways, there's even redundant T-34-76 with total of 2 posts. It's just the original 1940-produced variant as shown on the linked image.

BUR #21235 has been rejected.

create alias t-34-85 -> t-34

As above. Created a separate BUR to see which option we should use.

Tbh, I prefer the 85 model to have a separate tag, since it is visually distinct enough from regular T-34 model.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #21227 (forum #260113) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #21235 (forum #260132) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

The bulk update request #21227 (forum #260113) has been approved by @nonamethanks.