Imply ahoge types -> ahoge

BUR #40901 is pending approval.

create implication wilted_ahoge -> ahoge
create implication upright_ahoge -> ahoge

They are all types of ahoge featured in the ahoge wiki.

There are some posts of lightning ahoge that are antenna hair. lightning_ahoge antenna_hair.

GreyOmega said:

There are some posts of lightning ahoge that are antenna hair. lightning_ahoge antenna_hair.

Edited to include only the two other types, thank you! There shouldn’t be any problem with those.

aster1a said:

Edited to include only the two other types, thank you! There shouldn’t be any problem with those.

Didn't necessarily have to remove that implication. We could simply clean out the antenna hair posts either by untagging them or moving them to like a lightning_antenna_hair tag if needed. The antenna variants are likely to be rather rare, though probably a few examples that exist like post #1853348 being an antenna hair version of upright ahoge.

GreyOmega said:

Didn't necessarily have to remove that implication. We could simply clean out the antenna hair posts either by untagging them or moving them to like a lightning_antenna_hair tag if needed. The antenna variants are likely to be rather rare, though probably a few examples that exist like post #1853348 being an antenna hair version of upright ahoge.

I see. I guess we could add an “antenna hair” variant for every type (wilted, lightning, etc.), which could require some gardening.
For example, a “dyed_antenna_hair”? post #7216863 features this, but it’s tagged ahoge, dyed ahoge AND antenna hair, even though ahoge and antenna hair are stated to be different in their wikis.

post #8938302 is tagged ahoge, huge ahoge and antenna hair… again, looking at the wikis “ahoge” and “antenna hair” seem like they should be separate things, especially since antenna hair doesn’t implicate ahoge. But then a single character can be tagged with both because of the implications of certain types of ahoge (huge, dyed, etc.), so… what now?

Consistency would mean all types of ahoge implicating ahoge, which is already coupled with antenna hair in some posts. An alternative would be antenna hair itself implicating ahoge as to not create other tags. But the wikis go against this. Otherwise we can just keep everything the way it is and move on. Still, some posts (not all, due to certain designs) with both ahoge and antenna hair tags on one character might be contradictory, if antenna hair vastly differ from ahoge. I feel like I shouldn’t overthink at a late hour.

P.S. pikat_(vtuber) has only got 4 posts depicting her with antenna hair, to take a small example. 2 of them also have detached ahoge and thus ahoge too, while the other 2 posts don’t have any ahoge tag. So another option would be removing any ahoge tag from single characters who only have antenna hair… which I guess is again gardening.