Color brooch implications

BUR #47235 has been rejected.

create implication blue_brooch -> brooch
create implication red_brooch -> brooch
create implication green_brooch -> brooch
create implication pink_brooch -> brooch
create implication purple_brooch -> brooch
create implication yellow_brooch -> brooch
create implication orange_brooch -> brooch
create implication black_brooch -> brooch
create implication white_brooch -> brooch
create implication grey_brooch -> brooch
create implication brown_brooch -> brooch

Seems self-explanatory enough.

@aster1a I noticed you were manually populating these, please use a BUR instead.

Related: topic #32543, topic #20275

ANON_TOKYO said:

@aster1a I noticed you were manually populating these, please use a BUR instead.

As said above, very related topic #32543. It’s this BUR but larger. And went nowhere?

I don’t have much of an opinion regarding brooch colors. I was populating brooch.

My opinion is the same as before; these are not important enough to be tagged with colors.

aster1a said:

I don’t have much of an opinion regarding brooch colors. I was populating brooch.

If the colors are kept, they should be implicated, if they aren't then they should be mass-updated and nuked. This half approach is kinda silly IMO.

BUR #47248 has been approved by @evazion.

mass update (blue_brooch or red_brooch or green_brooch or pink_brooch or purple_brooch or yellow_brooch or orange_brooch or black_brooch or white_brooch or grey_brooch or brown_brooch) -brooch -> brooch
nuke blue_brooch
nuke red_brooch
nuke green_brooch
nuke pink_brooch
nuke purple_brooch
nuke yellow_brooch
nuke orange_brooch
nuke black_brooch
nuke white_brooch
nuke grey_brooch
nuke brown_brooch

All this talk about getting rid of these tags but nobody doing it, so fine, here's the BUR for voting purposes I guess.

ANON_TOKYO said:

If the colors are kept, they should be implicated, if they aren't then they should be mass-updated and nuked. This half approach is kinda silly IMO.

Yeah, I’ve taken the imply or nuke approach in several other threads. In this case, when I was trying to make a BUR, I didn’t know if brooches had to be updated with the color of their gemstones as well or not (forum #206077).

BUR #47276 has been rejected.

create implication aqua_brooch -> brooch

By the way, aqua is missing.

BUR #47277 has been approved by @evazion.

mass update aqua_brooch -> brooch
nuke aqua_brooch

Completing both BURs with aqua.

I usually tag gemstone brooches with color_gemstone. As for unconventional brooches, I never bothered to tag the color. Color of non-gemstone brooches is very neglectable. I just tag the design itself.

The bulk update request #47235 (forum #385963) has been rejected by @evazion.

The bulk update request #47248 (forum #385997) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #47276 (forum #386081) has been rejected by @evazion.

The bulk update request #47277 (forum #386082) has been approved by @evazion.