Posted under Tags
BUR #50040 has been rejected.
create implication daicon7 -> daicon
create implication daicon_iii -> daicon
create implication daicon_iv -> daicon_iii
Couldn't find anything on 7 anywhere asides it being the Osaka 08 one, and it seems to have nothing to do with the openings for 3 and 4, Daicon 4's opening is a sequel to the one for Daicon 3 hence it being implied to 3.
Updated by Space Force Detective
BUR #50041 has been rejected.
create implication daicon_bunny_girl -> daicon_girl
Not sure which should be the parent tag but they're the same character, just Bunny Girl is her older self.
Also I marked daicon 33 as deleted as there's no art under the tag and even if it was it was just an anniversary merch drop for Daicon 3 and 4's 33rd anniversary so the art made for it is just art of Daicon 3 and 4.
EDIT: Here's the art (I don't believe there was more, was all I saw when I looked up Daicon 33 earlier), it didn't even have the tag post #7345056
Updated by Space Force Detective
BUR #50048 has been rejected.
create implication daicon_girl -> daicon_bunny_girl
Alternate BUR for voting purposes.
Space_Force_Detective said:
BUR #50040 has been rejected.
create implication daicon7 -> daicon
create implication daicon_iii -> daicon
create implication daicon_iv -> daicon_iiiCouldn't find anything on 7 anywhere asides it being the Osaka 08 one, and it seems to have nothing to do with the openings for 3 and 4, Daicon 4's opening is a sequel to the one for Daicon 3 hence it being implied to 3.
Since I explained this poorly for anyone wondering, Gainax started out making the "openings" for the 3rd and 4th Daicon Scifi convensions, and opening 4 is a follow up to opening 3 with the same MC, just older, Daicon 7 has nothing to do with the openings of Daicon 3 and 4 hence only being implied to Daicon
zetsubousensei said:
I meh-ed it because I don't like the multilayered implication for such a small copytag, I didn't downvote it because I agree that it's technically correct.
The reason I'd argue it's relevant as the 2 openings are connected to eachother and nothing else with Daicon, it's a really unique case, say Daicon7's art here has nothing to do with them.
Space_Force_Detective said:
The reason I'd argue it's relevant as the 2 openings are connected to eachother and nothing else with Daicon, it's a really unique case, say Daicon7's art here has nothing to do with them.
daicon -daicon_iv -daicon_iii is 10 posts half of which is from the FLCL parody scene. When the largest tag Daicon IV is 89 posts (greater than the base Daicon tag), I just don't see a point, it all fits on the same page anyway. Nothing else connects within Daicon because besides the aforementioned FLCL parody bit of her sword surfing the only thing people have seen is IV.
Updated by zetsubousensei
BUR #51689 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication daicon7 -> daicon
create implication daicon_iii -> daicon
create implication daicon_iv -> daicon
Yeah, no point in having a nested tree of implications with so few posts.
The bulk update request #51689 (forum #402554) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The Daicon Bunny Girl and Daicon Girl are often depicted together. I think implicating them one to the other is just going to complicate things: neither feels like the parent tag of the other. It should be fine to keep them separate.
Note that the Daicon Girl tag is specifically for the young student, it's not meant to be an umbrella tag.
The bulk update request #50041 (forum #396026) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #50048 (forum #396043) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
BUR #51756 has been approved by @evazion.
create alias daicon_3 -> daicon_iii
create implication daicon_4 -> daicon_iv
Utility aliases.
The bulk update request #51756 (forum #402963) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #51781 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
remove implication daicon_4 -> daicon_iv
create alias daicon_4 -> daicon_iv
That wasn't an alias...
Damian0358 said:
BUR #51781 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
remove implication daicon_4 -> daicon_iv
create alias daicon_4 -> daicon_ivThat wasn't an alias...
MB, IDK how the fuck I managed to make that mistake
The bulk update request #51781 (forum #403057) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
