Detached weapon behind back

BUR #50338 has been rejected.

mass update favgroup:43119 -> detached_weapon_behind_back

I still think we need a tag for this situation.
When a weapon is behind the back, but not holding behind back, not worn on the back, also not weapon background.
Just like floating weapon or planted weapon behind back are common types.

I don't think we should be lumping planted weapons behind back and floating weapons behind back together, though I'd agree on a new tag especially for the latter.

Sometimes it's hard to tell whether the weapon is floating or planted. (post #9120884 post #10089899)
Some weapons visually exist somewhere between floating weapon and weapon background. (post #7498512 post #10234041)
Some of them are neither floating weapon nor planted weapon (or weapon placed behind back). (post #4938319 post #10339494)
So I would prefer to use detached_weapon_behind_back.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

You're trying to tag two different concepts. A planted weapon and a floating weapon are completely different. We don't need a tag that covers both even if sometimes it's ambiguous, for the same reason we don't need an umbrella tag for leggings and pantyhose just because sometimes you can't see the feet.

floating weapon on back/floating weapon behind back is a fine concept, you can even see it often in videogames, so it makes sense to tag it, but it makes no sense to lump it together with pictures of someone standing in front of a weapon driven into the ground.

These two concepts are also completely different from a third kind of post in your favgroup: post #10235299, basically a weapon drawn as a zoomed-in background. We shouldn't dump all this stuff together just because semantically they kinda sound similar.

The bulk update request #50338 (forum #397242) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.