Implying Siegrunen to Runes

BUR #52129 has been rejected.

create implication siegrunen -> runes

The Siegrunen are 2 Armanen Sieg (Victory) Runes (or Sowilo (Sun) runes if you prefer), thus they are Runes and should should fall under said tag.

this is the stupidest thing i've ever seen. that's like saying Bowser should imply turtle. think of the people actually searching for runes and finding a bunch of nazi posts and being like "where are my runes??"

I don't really agree with the implication for a different reason but suggesting that runes would be full of Nazi posts is wrong. Siegrunen is only tagged on 100 posts which is nowhere close to the 2000 posts under runes; and if you didn't want to see those posts, you can negate either Nazi or siegrunen. You've taken two situations and equated them when they aren't equal at all, with the first one not even being a hypothetical because it's not allowed in the first place.

The bulk update request #52129 (forum #404731) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

While I'll admit I don't purely get it (I mean they're runes lol), I've updated the wiki page for 'em to mention the runes tag isn't to be used for posts with just them.