BUR #60017 has been rejected.
create implication ai-synthesized_speech -> ai-assisted
Per title. It's not a visual aspect, but it's still using AI in the creation process, so does it count?
Posted under Tags
BUR #60017 has been rejected.
create implication ai-synthesized_speech -> ai-assisted
Per title. It's not a visual aspect, but it's still using AI in the creation process, so does it count?
I blacklist ai-assisted posts so I don't accidentally approve images made with assistance of AI. I don't want AI speech lumped in together with this tag because I see them as different things.
Freshblink said in forum #441465:
My only concern are cases where its fully AI generated and also gets AI-assisted because of this.
That's a good point. I guess it only works if either 1. we don't tag fully-generated content as ai-synth (like we don't with ai-generated background, but generated videos could have real audio) or 2. don't mind some posts having both.
HyphenSam said in forum #441467:
I blacklist ai-assisted posts so I don't accidentally approve images made with assistance of AI. I don't want AI speech lumped in together with this tag because I see them as different things.
Well these would be videos made with assistance of AI.
I meh'd it cuz I can just change my blacklist to "ai-assisted -ai-synthesized speech" so only visually ai assisted post gets blacklisted, and ai audio still up for me so that's that. I'm neutral really but idk if other people can be bothered to change it so they might have some problem with it
Updated by Andrecnuuy
What's the actual utility of this implication? With a literal reading, sure, AI speech is made with the assistance of AI, but I think there's value in having ai-assisted specifically refer to images, as a way to mark images that have some combination of human-drawn and AI-generated pixels or foundations.
The bulk update request #60017 (forum #441462) has been rejected by @Talulah.
wavedash said in forum #441484:
What's the actual utility of this implication? With a literal reading, sure, AI speech is made with the assistance of AI, but I think there's value in having ai-assisted specifically refer to images, as a way to mark images that have some combination of human-drawn and AI-generated pixels or foundations.
The idea would be blacklisting all AI stuff, but since people seem to not care about AI speech and what Freshblink said I'll just reject this. If you still want the first you can just blacklist both tags, after all.
I don't think it should because ai-assisted/ai-generated is for the art itself. Speech and audio are a separate entity from the drawing.