@葉月: This is a bad idea. We don't need any finer...

葉月
2010-03-11T05:18:40-05:00

This is a bad idea. We don't need any finer resolution than we have already; in fact, it would *lower* the overall quality of the tags. It's called the Laffer curve — basically, if you try too hard, you end up getting less in return. And breasts are simply too common to have expect anything better than a certain baseline of tagging; it's not possible to have something present in every other picture divided into five or more tags and expect everyone to apply them consistently and exhaustively. And you can already query pretty much everything:

1. Non-existant to small: flat_chest
2. Small to average: breasts -flat_chest -large_breasts -huge_breasts
3. Large (aka in the range you'd call "large" on a real woman): large_breasts
4. Humongous (larger that could be reasonably expected in reality): huge_breasts

This is enough granularity for any general-purpose tagging system. And as for #2 being 4 tags: albert has stated he's actively not interested in making it any less attractive for people to upgrade their account, and it's been consistently our policy to reject tags which can be satisfyingly emulated with queries, both because it's messier, and because it's albert paying for the site after all, so he's got a lot to say in this regard.