Does it make sense for this to be an alias instead?
Posted under General
When I think of portrait I think of post #700684 and apparently I'm not the only one, I'm not sure if it could be either.
It looks like there are actually 3 classes of picture currently under portrait:
1. stuff that should be under face (or bust)
2. pictures mocked up to look like portraits (i.e. a drawn-on frame like post #700684)
3. pictures that feature a portrait prominently (e.g. post #684530)
I suggest keeping portrait for #2, creating portrait_(object) for #3, and mass-editing the remainder to face (or bust, as appropriate).
glasnost said: I suggest keeping portrait for #2, creating portrait_(object) for #3, and mass-editing the remainder to face (or bust, as appropriate).
Makes sense to me. "Portrait" is a broader concept than just a face.
A mass edit would move all the valid portrait images though, so a manual tag alias job seems more appropriate. 500 isn't too many for that, I think.