Implicating naked_towel -> towel and nude.
Reason: The character is nude with a towel wrapped around them.
Also, if towels don't count as clothes (forum #51953 Log's post):
Implicating naked_towel -> nude.
Updated by jxh2154
Posted under General
Implicating naked_towel -> towel and nude.
Reason: The character is nude with a towel wrapped around them.
Also, if towels don't count as clothes (forum #51953 Log's post):
Implicating naked_towel -> nude.
Updated by jxh2154
-1 on the nude implication, since none of the naked_* tags (with the exception of naked_chocolate) fit the definition of nude.
@Hillside Moose: I'm not talking about the other naked_* here, but technically, just going by what the wiki says, naked_coat is within the definition of nude (but I would probably tag it as open_clothes bottomless, naked_cape, not explicitly mentioned in the wiki, but very close to a coat, only covering even less. For naked_ribbon it was made clear that the character is allowed to wear other clothes on top (forum #39704), naked_bandage generally fits, but since it has no wiki, I can't tell whether it should be used like naked_ribbon.
@Log: Are they garments or not? I was not sure if I could count them as clothes, but you said that they are just towels, no matter how they are "worn", so they can't be impossible_clothes. So if they aren't clothes, are you nude when having a only towel wrapped around you? (state of not wearing any garments)
If the towel wraps around the character and covers their chest and crotch area, then the image should not be tagged nude. The primary objective the nude tag is to cover images in which the central body is not covered at all. For example if a character is completely naked but is wearing a cloak that can completely surround them, if it was completely wrapped around them they wouldn't fall under the nude tag, but if the cloak was open exposing them underneath, then they could be tagged nude.
Whether or not the article on them is clothing or not is irrelevant.