Posted under General
Atm the tags on_stomach and on_side feel a bit counter-intuitive since even in the description it says laying_on_stomach.
If the shorter tag is desirable could we add a laying_on_stomach and laying_on_side to each respective existing tag?
Updated by user 344162
About laying: See the lying wiki.
When I tag an image, I always use both tags as if they were one = lying on_stomach, lying on_side, lying on_back.
I haven't suggested the on_* -> lying implication because there might be cases where someone is on his *, but not lying. The good old vaulting horse doesn't disappoint:
post #290783 (e)
post #621292 (e)
post #20384 (e)
post #13658 (s)
S1eth said:
About laying: See the lying wiki.
Well that was rather embarrassing. Well won't make that mistake again.
S1eth said:
When I tag an image, I always use both tags as if they were one = lying on_stomach, lying on_side, lying on_back.
I haven't suggested the on_* -> lying implication because there might be cases where someone is on his *, but not lying. The good old vaulting horse doesn't disappoint:
post #290783 (e)
post #621292 (e)
post #20384 (e)
post #13658 (s)
What about aliasing lying_on_stomach -> on_stomach? The same would go for the other on_*
