Tag Implication: hong meiling (panda) -> hong meiling

Implicating hong meiling (panda) -> hong meiling.

Reason: Character variation.

But what if it's seki cosplaying?

I would argue you can't really cosplay an animal and even if you were you would be cosplaying the character just as much if not more so this sounds fine.

Actually, just realised why you CAN'T implicate this.

There are the tribble-like HML pandakids, who are NOT Hong Meiling, e.g. post #878053.
Tagging here would be erroneous.

Tagging these hong_meiling_(panda) in the first place is erroneous.

S1eth said:
Tagging these hong_meiling_(panda) in the first place is erroneous.

True, but as per its wiki:
"Also her Tribble-like kids (although how that works is a mystery)."

So we're using the tag for convenience's sake.

You're quoting yourself, which kinda negates your point.
Wikis can be changed.

I don't even remember editing that, LOL.

Does it actually negate the point though?
Unless you want hong_meiling_(panda)'s_child.

Removing the tag from images of panda kids that don't include Meiling should be enough. Just leave the panda tag.

Hong_meiling_(panda) should also implicate panda, now that I think about it.

Hellbus said:
Hong_meiling_(panda) should also implicate panda, now that I think about it.

Most of them are a blob with black eyes and ears, which is not what I would want in a panda search. Do people even look at the tags anymore before they blurt out implications?