Two reviewers said it has bad quality, but I'm staring at it and I can't see anything wrong. An explanation would be helpful.
Posted under General
Two reviewers said it has bad quality, but I'm staring at it and I can't see anything wrong. An explanation would be helpful.
What's wrong with this upload? I don't think its as off as the other deleted character art
i just dont get why some of these were not approved
Not dynamic enough?
Can you please help me to understand why post #4087330 would be deleted? Art from this artist seems to be somewhat hit and miss for getting approved and I don't understand why?
Examples from this artist that I've posted: post #3656244 (deleted), post #4017227 (approved), post #3995647 (approved), post #3849062 (approved), post #3737635 (approved)
Thank you for helping me to understand what to look for.
gsands.g said:
Can you please help me to understand why post #4087330 would be deleted? Art from this artist seems to be somewhat hit and miss for getting approved and I don't understand why?
Examples from this artist that I've posted: post #3656244 (deleted), post #4017227 (approved), post #3995647 (approved), post #3849062 (approved), post #3737635 (approved)
Thank you for helping me to understand what to look for.
I'd say the common factor for the deleted posts is a wonky body-to-head ratio, scrunchy necks and a focal point that draws attention to it. Though post #3995647 has the weirder head ratio, the focus is drawn away from it.
Updated by Elfaleon
1055's works seem to get approved, and yet post #4086045 and post #4086037 weren't, despite being of the same art style and quality as all of other works. Why?
Edit: These two I don't get either
post #4087846
post #4087851
And I'm guessing these are because of the faces? Only one of zeromomo's works were deleted before this.
post #4089360
post #4089354
post #4089347
post #4089339
Updated by kah0922
Elfaleon said:
I'd say the common factor for the deleted posts is a wonky body-to-head ratio, scrunchy necks and a focal point that draws attention to it. Though post #3995647 has the weirder head ratio, the focus is drawn away from it.
Thank you for your response. I don't really see the "wonky body-to-head ratio" myself, especially given that the anime artform tends toward very mild bobble-headism IMHO, but I'll take your word for it.
post #4089306 if it was the hands in the sleeves feel that's nick picking
post #4084235 only think i can think of is the thigh gab but don't feel like that's enough for deletion.
post #4084085 guro is allowed don't see anything wrong with this picture besides it being disturbing i flipped it counter clockwise think it look more natural this way
post #4084092 this is how it looks on pixiv the angle was kinda wired but original
post #4084200 a bunch of other pics from the same artist no idea why this wasn't approved
post #4089470 160 post from the same artist similar quality to post #4050867
post #4088467 thing this is a good bodysuit pic
Updated by leotard2020
post #4089892 looks like the same quality of its approved parent and sibling to me, can someone help me understand why it was deleted?
Why was my post #4089767 deleted? It's quality isn't below the other pictures from the same artist imo.
Would love to know what was wrong with post #4084584. I feel lost.
What wrong with these post's? I don't see any problem on them.
post #4090204
post #3387216
post #3387226
post #2780260
post #2829930
Updated by Maxx98
klerold said:
Why was my post #4089767 deleted? It's quality isn't below the other pictures from the same artist imo.
I think the nose is misplaced, which makes her face kinda weird.
leotard2020 said:
post #4089306 very sketchy, what makes it look like it has low quality
post #4084235 the behind girl looks like she has a long arm, but the rest is fine
post #4084085 guro and especially gury of that 'pet girl' isn´t liked that much. And it wasn´t needed to upload the same image twice. Then the quality is kinda poor in my eyes. More blurry and boring than really interesting, with the only really good part are her eyes.
post #4084200 Weird but not bad perspective. I can´t see anything wrong with that one.
post #4089470 her eyes could be the dealbreaker, or her shoulders. IMO it´s fine.
post #4088467 it´s fine, but special hardcore bondage isn´t that liked most of the time and most likely not approved
Not my upload, but I want to know why post #4092979 wasn't approved.
post #4090533 I don't see what the problems with this one are.