Review again, please
post #6737538
post #6733570
post #6734752
post #6709128
post #6380827
post #6707909
Posted under General
I've been posting a lot of my favourite doodles from 3amsoda (and intend to post a lot more, slowly). most of them have been approved but the last handful weren't:
post #6751689
post #6751366 (this is the only one where I can maybe see an issue in that her left thigh is kinda big, but still seems good enough overall)
post #6751356
I think the above 3 are quality enough doodles. but I can also tell they're kind of primitive compared to most of their posts, if I were to guess the overall reason they were disapproved
but this post #6745708 was a recent one that is comparable to all their high quality doodles that were approved, and I really don't see any issue with this image (and would love to appeal it unless someone makes a point about it here)
Updated by throne spl
Campanella00 said:
I've been posting a lot of my favourite doodles from 3amsoda (and intend to post a lot more, slowly). most of them have been approved but the last handful weren't
post #6751689
post #6751366 (this is the only one where I can maybe see an issue in that her left thigh is kinda big, but still seems good enough overall)
post #6751356
I think the above 3 are quality enough doodles, but I can also tell they're kind of primitive compared to most of their posts, if I were to guess the overall reason they were disapproved
I'm no approver, but as someone who's had similar luck with images like this, my assumption is that they were too "sketchy", or indeed too "primitive" as you put it, for the approvers who checked them's liking. They look quite a bit rougher compared to his other works that got approved, so I can't say I'm too surprised to see them not make the cut.
but this post #6745708 was a recent one that is comparable to all their high quality doodles that were approved, and I really don't see any issue with this image (and would love to appeal it unless someone makes a point about it here)
Personally, I don't really see anything too glaring about this one to see why it wouldn't have been approved like the others. Shading does look a little weird compared to the approved ones, but it's not something I see as anything major. You might have luck appealing that one. I could be missing something though, but I'd say it's worth a shot.
Hello, I've recently posted a lot 40k fanart, most of which got approved after essentially being told "western art is welcome if it's high quality". Two deleted posts stood out to me.
This one is well drawn but is in watercolor and a close up photo, so I guess the watercolor effect might have made it a bit blurry looking? Is it because of the watercolor photo aspect?
post #6753731
This one is humor but well drawn. The artist has been approved previously.
post #6744141
post #6753186
post #6753200
post #6739471
Why were they unapproved really?
Why not approved? Though i can understand since its this artist lol
Here with this one. Was there any problems in this image?
post #6758462
Updated by Kommandant
was this just too simple?
post #6675305
post #6693520 [1]
post #6716203
post #6713864
post #6729368
post #6733230
post #6733240
post #6750297
post #6752801
post #6755702
post #6755718
post #6759136
Is there something wrong with these images? They seem ok to me.
[1] this one already has a sibling(?) image here post #4701703
Campanella00 said:
was this just too simple?
For me, yes.
xcv450 said:
post #6675305
post #6693520 [1]
post #6716203
post #6713864
post #6729368
post #6733230
post #6733240
post #6750297
post #6752801
post #6755702
post #6755718
post #6759136
Is there something wrong with these images? They seem ok to me.[1] this one already has a sibling(?) image here post #4701703
Some have minor issues with body proportions, like forearm and upper arm. It's hard to know what was done to images from third-party sources and personally, I don't want to encourage sourcing images from wikis.
post #6675305 is also a character profile with a seiyuu's photo, something that I wouldn't post here.
post #6733240 and post #6733230 are game screenshots, right?
It doesn't matter for approvals, but you could put more effort into tagging your uploads.
they are not bad
post #6765974
post #6766126
post #6754686
post #6764116
is this worth trying to appeal?
Feedback for post #6761002?
Whats wrong for these post?
post #6768977 (parent post #6768978)
post #6756539
now and then I debate appealing this. I can't see anything particularly wrong with this besides her fingers (which aren't the worst).
post #6770301 its a obvious use of ai then a missed finger and a "poor collarbone and breast" isn't a prove isn't a full ai work the post has enough corrections to can be call ai-assisted if we check other works had same problems and nobody says nothing.
By the way we have a problem whit ai-assisted when you see this post #6720714 is same a ai-base with really enough corrections to be ai-assisted and still deleted there are ai-assisted works with less "human work"
Imagine_Breaker said:
post #6770301 its a obvious use of ai then a missed finger and a "poor collarbone and breast" isn't a prove isn't a full ai work the post has enough corrections to can be call ai-assisted if we check other works had same problems and nobody says nothing.
By the way we have a problem whit ai-assisted when you see this post #6720714 is same a ai-base with really enough corrections to be ai-assisted and still deleted there are ai-assisted works with less "human work"
bring it up in topic #22285