Tag implication: food_on_head -> object_on_head

create implication food_on_head -> object_on_head

Link to implication

Food is an object.

Done

Bumping this ancient topic to question this implication. It's my understanding that fluids are not generally referred to as "objects", so object_on_head seems like the wrong tag for liquid foods like honey (post #1842490), chocolate (post #2404217), and mayonnaise (post #2804382). Moreover, the tag's wiki says that it is for objects "placed on the head to act as [conventional headgear]", which doesn't make much sense with these foods.

Should this implication be removed? The alternative, as I see it, is to restrict food_on_head to solid objects like apples and pancakes, but this would make the tag an anomaly among the other food_on_* tags like food_on_body and food_on_face, which are commonly used for fluids of various sorts.

+1 for deimplication to object on head.

I consider food not even as an object at all, be it a "solid" sandwich or more fluid stuff like honey.

Provence said:

I consider food not even as an object at all, be it a "solid" sandwich or more fluid stuff like honey.

So you think something like post #2275928 shouldn't have object on head? That doesn't make sense to me.

+1 to iridescent slime's logic though.

kuuderes_shadow said:

So you think something like post #2275928 shouldn't have object on head? That doesn't make sense to me.

Not really, but I see that's a minor opinion.
Anyway, doesn't matter for this topic whichgot bumped due to a request for deimplication.