Notes

Post Note Text Created
11346787 4372207.1 » Checked her wristband afterward... and her heart rate had gone through the roof.
11386198 4372206.1 » 10.5 Anniversary
11386198 4372205.1 » Marie
11386198 4372204.1 » Kay
11320528 4372203.1 » Mmhmm.
11320528 4372202.1 » I'm really sorry.
11320528 4372201.1 » Mm.
11384419 4372200.1 » Isaka Fuu
11320528 4372199.1 » I'm sorry...
11320528 4372198.1 » Mm.
11320528 4372197.1 » I'm sorry.
11384419 4372196.1 » Reproduction prohibited.
10922472 4372195.1 » I made a weird noise...
11384419 4372194.1 » ■Summary of the text below Because the act of hiding one's body can be seen as making one's shame visible, hiding it with a nonchalant look makes it ambiguous, giving it a "fap-worthy" (shikoriti) blank space. That's the topic. Personally, I find it more fap-worthy than being visibly embarrassed. What about everyone else? ■Original weird text I hesitated to tweet a while ago I'm going to talk about something gross, but since the act of hiding a naked body is itself an act that shows the manifestation of shame, even though it's a universal reaction in modern times, those of us with twisted fetishes find sufficient "fap-worthiness" in the act of hiding itself. (mysterious confirmation) However, I think there are exceptions like cultural reasons, consideration for surroundings, just being ordered, or reflex, and unlike reactions like blushing or cold sweats, the act of hiding itself is an action, so it can be done intentionally. Isn't it possible that the act of hiding a naked body doesn't confirm shame due to that "denying the antecedent" fallacy thing?
10922472 4372193.1 » <i>sliiiide</i>
10922472 4372192.1 » <b><i>Jolt</i></b>
10922472 4372191.1 » Yachiyo's back is totally defenseless...
10922503 4372190.1 » Copied 11 notes from post #11197506. (deleted)
10922503 4372189.1 » What's with this difference in reaction...?
10922503 4372188.1 » <i>Pout</i>