That's not a bad anatomy but a bad perspective. It really seems like artist made her lower body so large to show that it is closer to the viewer than the upper body.

I guess you haven't noticed the fingers or proportions/distances between the different parts of the torso...

There's nothing wrong with fingers, we just can't see the thumbs because they are close to the palms.
As for the proportions, I've already addressed it in my previous post.

MyrMindservant is right it's just bad perspective.

You're right. The fact that all 4 fingers on each hand are the same length is perfectly normal. I just look at my own hand and wonder I have been cursed with pinky fingers that are shorter than the rest of the lot.

Darthob said:
You're right. The fact that all 4 fingers on each hand are the same length is perfectly normal. I just look at my own hand and wonder I have been cursed with pinky fingers that are shorter than the rest of the lot.

Your pinky is the only finger that has different length?
You are weird, sir.
My middle finger is longer than both my indicator and my ring finger, with the pinky being the shortest of them...

Darthob said:
You're right. The fact that all 4 fingers on each hand are the same length is perfectly normal.

And this is supposed to be important in this situation? Are you trolling? Fingers drawn that way are so common that we would need to start a grandiose purge if it would be something that matters here.
Don't forget, we are talking about problems that are serious enough to warrant a post deletion.

Don't get me wrong, I recognize that this image has its problems. But people are exaggerating them and I'm trying to make thing clear.