Poor girl have gone the deep end. She keep saying her sister's name during sex.

Implied futa? Why not missionary tribbing?

The artist's name describes this picture perfectly.

she has no "sister" the fuck are you on about

Killerkaim said:

she has no "sister" the fuck are you on about

I checked the wiki page for Mutsuki. It says that Kisaragi is her younger sister.

Killerkaim said:

she has no "sister" the fuck are you on about

Mutsuki is the first of the mutsuki class destroyers, kisaragi was the second of the mutsuki class, so she's her sister ship

A post added to the "About Time"-pool 9 years after it being postet????

Ok this is ridiculous. @MilWonder explain why do you keep adding this image back into pools? What does this have to do with war? What is so relevant about this 9 year old image that you added it to pool #4661?

iori98 said:

Ok this is ridiculous. @MilWonder explain why do you keep adding this image back into pools? What does this have to do with war? What is so relevant about this 9 year old image that you added it to pool #4661?

First, I just misunderstood when adding it to pool #4661. I... I just didn't know that it shouldn't be in that pool, so I am sorry.

Second, it seems Mutsuki gets insane like when she lost Kisaragi in battle, and when she is having sex with Fubuki, she just keeps yelling Kisaragi's name, so I put this picture in pool #21540.

I'm sorry so much, sir. If you're not okay, you can remove it.

MilWonder said:

First, I just misunderstood when adding it to pool #4661. I... I just didn't know that it shouldn't be in that pool, so I am sorry.

Second, it seems Mutsuki gets insane like when she lost Kisaragi in battle, and when she is having sex with Fubuki, she just keeps yelling Kisaragi's name, so I put this picture in pool #21540.

It's just smut and not that deep. When putting images into a pool like this you need context from either the artist commentary or a previous image from either a parent post or pool. Take post #2248706 for example, there's no need for interpretation or headcanons since the artist has already told us what happened.

iori98 said:

It's just smut and not that deep. When putting images into a pool like this you need context from either the artist commentary or a previous image from either a parent post or pool. Take post #2248706 for example, there's no need for interpretation or headcanons since the artist has already told us what happened.

Thank you you your advice. I will be better.

What are your arguments for removing yuri and tribadism and adding futanari tags?

There is nothing in the picture that would directly indicate that there is futanari, and there is also nothing in the characters' speak.

Danbooru how to tag page said:
Tag what you see, not what you know. In other words, only tag the visual and factual elements in the image.

Okay, implied_futanari is arguable. But it could be something like double_dildo as well.

Also, the tags in the original post on pixiv indicate that the picture depicts yuri and tribadism.

Neiri said:

What are your arguments for removing yuri and tribadism and adding futanari tags?

There is nothing in the picture that would directly indicate that there is futanari, and there is also nothing in the characters' speak.

Okay, implied_futanari is arguable. But it could be something like double_dildo as well.

Also, the tags in the original post on pixiv indicate that the picture depicts yuri and tribadism.

Penetrative sex positions with thrusting should almost always be tagged as futa_with_female. TWYS doesn't mean we can't use our brains to draw obvious inferences. If it's clear that image is depicting penetrative sex, you don't need to actually see the penis, and it shouldn't be tagged yuri. Hypothetical but unseen double dildos or strap-ons aren't helpful. See forum #272717 for a more thorough discussion of how these tags should be used.

That said, looking closer at this particular image, I agree with you. The positions of the bodies behind the foreground leg look at least as consistent with tribadism as with penetration. The motion lines aren't really consistent with thrusting. And the pixiv post is tagged tribadism, which I didn't realize originally. So you're right, it should be tagged yuri.

Coremack said:

That said, looking closer at this particular image, I agree with you. The positions of the bodies behind the foreground leg look at least as consistent with tribadism as with penetration. The motion lines aren't really consistent with thrusting. And the pixiv post is tagged tribadism, which I didn't realize originally. So you're right, it should be tagged yuri.

The scissoring/tribadism tag wasn't added by the artist, so that doesn't mean anything. And I don't think this looks equally like trabadism as it does futa.

blindVigil said:

The scissoring/tribadism tag wasn't added by the artist, so that doesn't mean anything. And I don't think this looks equally like trabadism as it does futa.

Yeah, looking at it again, now I think you're right.