Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? namaniku atk 793

Copyright

  • ? hitsugi no chaika 505

Character

  • ? chaika trabant 333

General

  • ? 1girl 7.8M
  • ? ass 741k
  • ? back 113k
  • ? bag 305k
  • ? barefoot 470k
  • ? bipod 1.1k
  • ? black boots 168k
  • ? blush 3.8M
  • ? book 178k
  • ? boots 654k
  • ? box 74k
  • ? bullet 6.7k
  • ? butt crack 27k
  • ? canteen 985
  • ? coffin 2.6k
  • ? covering chest 720
  • ? covering privates 55k
  • ? dress 1.8M
  • ? embarrassed 130k
  • ? feet 254k
  • ? from above 133k
  • ? from behind 305k
  • ? full body 1.2M
  • ? glowing 130k
  • ? gun 182k
  • ? hairband 644k
  • ? leaning forward 151k
  • ? light particles 76k
  • ? looking at viewer 4.5M
  • ? looking back 344k
  • ? nude 641k
  • ? platform boots 5.1k
  • ? pouch 47k
  • ? purple eyes 1.1M
  • ? scope 6.6k
  • ? soles 138k
  • ? solo 6.5M
  • ? standing 1.2M
  • ? standing on one leg 116k
  • ? tile floor 22k
  • ? tiles 34k
  • ? unworn boots 3.3k
  • ? unworn clothes 9.8k
  • ? weapon 760k
  • ? white hair 959k

Meta

  • ? highres 7.4M
  • ? third-party edit 27k
  • ? ↳ nude filter 2.3k

Information

  • ID: 2311276
  • Uploader: DeusExCalamus »
  • Date: about 10 years ago
  • Approver: Miene »
  • Size: 3.38 MB .png (2048x1406) »
  • Source: yande.re/post/show/349984 »
  • Rating: Questionable
  • Score: 37
  • Favorites: 80
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Nude filter (about 10 years ago)
This post belongs to a parent (learn more) « hide
post #2199680
post #2311276
Resized to 41% of original (view original)
chaika trabant (hitsugi no chaika) drawn by namaniku_atk
  • ‹ prev Search: status:any next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Chucu
    about 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    Missunderstanding the concept of field strip.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 460797
    about 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    Let's see if this post can stay here....

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    kthxbai
    about 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    It's a really obvious nude filter. Bra strap shadow, really obvious butt, hair shadow mysteriously disappears, weird highlight where the jewel was before. Shut it down.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    OOZ662
    about 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    Keep in mind that just being a nude filter isn't a cause for deletion.

    I don't really like the image to begin with or else I'd probably reapprove it.

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    iridescent slime
    about 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    The original wouldn't be so bad if not for little things like the jagged shadow and flat clothing, and a floor texture that makes the rest of the image look comparatively bland. It looks like the artist started with a 3d render and tried to cover it up with a bit of photoshop magic, but missed some annoying details.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    kthxbai
    about 10 years ago
    [hidden]

    Nude filter is not be a cause for deletion, but this is not even a good nude filter, it's jagged, discolored, and obvious at a glance. It's honestly somewhat lazily done. The photoshopper could have at least used anti-aliasing.
    Take a look at the other nude filter posts that remain on the site. For the most part, if you examine the posts without their parent posts, it's only with careful scrutiny that you can tell they've been altered at all.
    This one you can tell immediately with how flat her butt looks and how rough the lines are around her butt. I don't think any of the other nude filters that remain on this site (save post #592044 but that's been half removed already) should be removed for being nude filters. I think this one should be removed for being a poorly done nude filter.
    If you compare this post to other deleted nude filter posts, there are several that are of a similar quality. Should we undelete those?
    We're supposed to hold third party edits to a higher degree of quality than other posts anyway, right?

    Updated by kthxbai about 10 years ago

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link

    Leave a comment

    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /