Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More » Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

Blacklisted (help)

  • guro
  • scat
  • furry -rating:g
Disable all Re-enable all

Artist

  • ? surume (surume2014) 7

Copyright

  • ? kantai collection 510k

Character

  • ? kashima (kancolle) 9.6k

General

  • ? 1girl 6.6M
  • ? anus 129k
  • ? areola slip 56k
  • ? ass 646k
  • ? bar censor 172k
  • ? blue eyes 2.0M
  • ? blue skirt 197k
  • ? blush 3.2M
  • ? bra 222k
  • ? breasts 3.8M
  • ? breasts out 69k
  • ? censored 506k
  • ? clitoris 21k
  • ? from below 91k
  • ? grey hair 782k
  • ? hair between eyes 1.3M
  • ? jacket 1.1M
  • ? kneehighs 139k
  • ? looking at viewer 3.7M
  • ? miniskirt 295k
  • ? nipples 909k
  • ? open clothes 563k
  • ? open jacket 280k
  • ? panties 695k
  • ? panties around one leg 22k
  • ? parted lips 560k
  • ? pink bra 22k
  • ? pink panties 51k
  • ? pleated skirt 553k
  • ? pussy 401k
  • ? sitting 1.0M
  • ? skirt 1.7M
  • ? socks 446k
  • ? solo 5.5M
  • ? spread pussy 33k
  • ? spreading own pussy 13k
  • ? thighs 636k
  • ? twintails 992k
  • ? underwear 854k

Meta

  • ? commentary request 3.6M
  • ? highres 6.0M
  • ? md5 mismatch 103k

Information

  • ID: 2381745
  • Uploader: Lannihan »
  • Date: about 9 years ago
  • Size: 149 KB .jpg (763x1200) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/57227413 »
  • Rating: Explicit
  • Score: 22
  • Favorites: 40
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days after returning to moderation queue (over 8 years ago)
kashima (kantai collection) drawn by surume_(surume2014)

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 鹿島。

    提督さん、ちょっとだけ…お願いします…

    • ‹ prev Search: user:Lannihan status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Lannihan
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Ok 4 downvotes are really interesting, so there is something with the image, that clearly doesn't fit their taste? the quality of the site?

    Im interested on reading about this.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 460797
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Lannihan said:

    Ok 4 downvotes are really interesting, so there is something with the image, that clearly doesn't fit their taste? the quality of the site?

    Im interested on reading about this.

    How do you come to four downvotes?
    I see three users of the nine who can vote, ehich would make it one single downvote.

  • 1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Lannihan
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Because I saw 6 votes 2 hours ago, and now has 2, thats why I say 4 downvotes.

    But more importantly, the question.

    Updated by Lannihan about 9 years ago

  • -1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Ketuuban
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Lannihan said:

    Ok 4 downvotes are really interesting, so there is something with the image, that clearly doesn't fit their taste? the quality of the site?

    Im interested on reading about this.

    I usually see ppl triggered at REALLY wierd fetishes like the “poo poo pee pee” mene (or abstract kind of art overall), but can't spot anything remotely wrong about pic related aside nudity and the act of masturbation. Hmm.

    My sincere congrats, don't remember getting as much downboats even once.

    Updated by Ketuuban about 9 years ago

  • -3
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Lannihan
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Ketuuban said:

    ...don't remember getting as much downboats even once.

    Thats the point I would like to put on debate

  • -1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    OOZ662
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    I didn't downvote it (hadn't even seen it until now), but if you're asking for my niggles, it'd be the spherical breasts that don't fit on her chest, the pretty heavy JPEG artifacting, and the way the face seems very 2D. That said, this site as a whole tends to be a lot more likely to upvote things than I would be so it is a little surprising to see something that isn't complete trash going downward.

  • 3
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Lannihan
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    OOZ662 said:

    I didn't downvote it (hadn't even seen it until now), but if you're asking for my niggles, it'd be the spherical breasts that don't fit on her chest, the pretty heavy JPEG artifacting, and the way the face seems very 2D. That said, this site as a whole tends to be a lot more likely to upvote things than I would be so it is a little surprising to see something that isn't complete trash going downward.

    Then, shouldnt be flagged?

    Downvote for that reason doesn't fits like a valid argument.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 460797
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Lannihan said:

    Then, shouldnt be flagged?

    Downvote for that reason doesn't fits like a valid argument.

    Why flag? That would be the death sentence to a post one really dislikes.
    A downvote only tells "I don't like it, but it's still on the edge of ok".

  • 2
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Lannihan
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Provence said:

    Why flag? That would be the death sentence to a post one really dislikes.
    A downvote only tells "I don't like it, but it's still on the edge of ok".

    JPEG artifacts is a valid motive for flag, assuming your are not restricting the users to do that.

    The up/down votes are a topic, the new Flagging is another, there isn't reason to mix them now.

    Your downvote vision isn't not the same as OOZ62 or mine, so your point of view about that isn't required yet.

  • -1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    [deleted]
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    [deleted]

    Deleted by RaisingK over 5 years ago

    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /