As horrifying as this could be, considering the swol duck is made of wool, the Pekodam and Miko-char can just light it up with flamethrowers and burn it to the ground. All that bulk is all fluff and no muscle, lol.
As horrifying as this could be, considering the swol duck is made of wool, the Pekodam and Miko-char can just light it up with flamethrowers and burn it to the ground. All that bulk is all fluff and no muscle, lol.
Did you not see the feeble attempts of Pekora firing fire arrows at it? It only made it madder! How did you think it claimed the head of its two victims?
It now has a taste of hololive blood and there is no stopping it now.
Did you not see the feeble attempts of Pekora firing fire arrows at it? It only made it madder! How did you think it claimed the head of its two victims?
It now has a taste of hololive blood and there is no stopping it now.
Fire arrows in Minecraft don't set things on fire though, which was why she was shooting them. If a normal fire was set on the Shubangelion, it would easily burn without question. A good example of this is when Subaru accidently burned down Pekora's wool penguin house when the fire was in a tunnel underneath her house, so the swol duck can suffer the same fate with a proper fire placed by it.
Also given how Miko altered her head to be puking lava instead of water, if no one is careful that WILL burn down the wool duck.
Fire arrows in Minecraft don't set things on fire though, which was why she was shooting them. If a normal fire was set on the Shubangelion, it would easily burn without question. A good example of this is when Subaru accidently burned down Pekora's wool penguin house when the fire was in a tunnel underneath her house, so the swol duck can suffer the same fate with a proper fire placed by it.
Also given how Miko altered her head to be puking lava instead of water, if no one is careful that WILL burn down the wool duck.
...he was clearly joking. Either way, that would mean the faces and certain pieces of the other mechs would be super easy to destroy. But we aren't talking about that considering we are talking about a "what if" scenario where these things could actually move. So assume metal even if there is none present purely because of Minecraft's limitations.
Also, Miko used orange wool to give it the look of lava. It ain't actual lava.
...he was clearly joking. Either way, that would mean the faces and certain pieces of the other mechs would be super easy to destroy. But we aren't talking about that considering we are talking about a "what if" scenario where these things could actually move. So assume metal even if there is none present purely because of Minecraft's limitations.
Also, Miko used orange wool to give it the look of lava. It ain't actual lava.
Hard to tell if something is a joke via text with no emoticons, which if I recall correctly aren't allowed to be used in the comments here. Also, my comment being voted down for no reason doesn't enforce that either.
Hard to tell if something is a joke via text with no emoticons, which if I recall correctly aren't allowed to be used in the comments here. Also, my comment being voted down for no reason doesn't enforce that either.
He was giving an inanimate object feelings and desires. Made it so it had taken two victims, again an inanimate object doing that. Then talking about it having bloodlust, which, again, an object can't have. So to me makes it seem quite obvious it is a joke, but I guess different folk see things in a different light.
But I do agree that not being allowed to use emotes more than max once in a comment (and preferably less) limits stuff a lot. I have no idea why they have that. I understand not allowing Emojis, but emoticons? We humans have huge issues reading nuances in a pure text (when not in story format).
The rule is "Do not abuse emoticons. Don't post lines such as "OMG >_< this is so funny~~~!! xD She totaly did that on purpose :PPP btw any1 have link to full download >_>". One emoticon per post should be the absolute upper limit, and you should be way below that on average. Just think how often you make such faces when speaking in real life; that's how often you should be making them in comments."
Which is just plain stupid if I may be utterly frank and risk insulting whomevers put down that rule. Yes, we don't do such facial expressions much in real life, but we use tone shifts constantly which is what the emotes are often replacement for. Honestly, this rule is short sighted as all hell. And using an extreme example isn't gonna make for a good point for not using them moderately and where it fits.
