I think the anatomy is mostly fine? Maybe I'm blind, though if I am isn't this what the "bad anatomy" tag is for? There's approved art on here with far wonkier anatomy. I don't really see why this should be removed, and the other one that's been on here for 3 months, with a 200+ score, and was previously approved.

MisterJuice said:

I think the anatomy is mostly fine? Maybe I'm blind, though if I am isn't this what the "bad anatomy" tag is for? There's approved art on here with far wonkier anatomy. I don't really see why this should be removed, and the other one that's been on here for 3 months, with a 200+ score, and was previously approved.

The problematic part was how the hips and butt was aligned.
Also, score and how long the picture has been here doesn't matter for flagging, although in this case I do feel that is a bit extreme; simply slapping bad_anatomy tag would've suffice.

Rathurue said:

The problematic part was how the hips and butt was aligned.
Also, score and how long the picture has been here doesn't matter for flagging, although in this case I do feel that is a bit extreme; simply slapping bad_anatomy tag would've suffice.

I think the bad anatomy tag would suffice as well. Also sure the score and age on the picture don't matter ultimately, but I think at least personally if something is generally well received on the site and has been here for a bit, that deleting it is a little extreme is all. Fine if I'm the only one that thinks that, just my two cents.

I really hope we are not seeing another emergence of a mass of "anatomy check" flags that seem to happen every once in awhile.

cokerpilot said:

I really hope we are not seeing another emergence of a mass of "anatomy check" flags that seem to happen every once in awhile.

I feel like we get a lot of unusual, and often out of the blue, flags for a variety of reasons. I always find myself somewhat confused by it.