Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? r1 174

Copyright

  • ? original 1.3M

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? anus 130k
  • ? black hair 1.7M
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? clitoris 21k
  • ? female pubic hair 97k
  • ? large breasts 1.8M
  • ? nipples 917k
  • ? nude 551k
  • ? open mouth 2.7M
  • ? panties 699k
  • ? panties around one leg 22k
  • ? pubic hair 151k
  • ? pussy 405k
  • ? solo 5.6M
  • ? spread pussy 33k
  • ? spreading own pussy 13k
  • ? uncensored 152k
  • ? underwear 861k
  • ? urethra 3.6k

Meta

  • ? highres 6.1M

Information

  • ID: 537938
  • Uploader: holocauxt »
  • Date: almost 16 years ago
  • Approver: NWF Renim »
  • Size: 491 KB .jpg (948x1400) »
  • Source: sr1.sakura.ne.jp/NewYear_2009ERO2.jpg »
  • Rating: Explicit
  • Score: 16
  • Favorites: 72
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 89% of original (view original)
original drawn by r1
  • ‹ prev Search: user:holocauxt next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    holocauxt
    almost 16 years ago
    [hidden]

    I still can't understand for the life of me how a perfectly fine image (by Danbooru's strict standards anyway) can still get a negative score. Is there a prude in the mod team or something?

    -2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Dalveska
    almost 16 years ago
    [hidden]

    holocauxt said:
    I still can't understand for the life of me how a perfectly fine image (by Danbooru's strict standards anyway) can still get a negative score. Is there a prude in the mod team or something?

    Hmm...maybe he prefers shaved?

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    sillycon
    almost 16 years ago
    [hidden]

    There are some who auto-down-vote explicit images.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    holocauxt
    almost 16 years ago
    [hidden]

    The reason being...?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    sillycon
    almost 16 years ago
    [hidden]

    holocauxt said:
    The reason being...?

    They don't want explicit images on the site? I thought that was pretty self-evident.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /