Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? go robots 313

Copyright

  • ? original 1.3M

General

  • ? 2girls 1.1M
  • ? black hair 1.7M
  • ? book 154k
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? classroom 20k
  • ? desk 45k
  • ? gigantic breasts 11k
  • ? huge breasts 246k
  • ? indoors 422k
  • ? multiple girls 1.7M
  • ? oppai loli 7.1k
  • ? school 7.3k
  • ? short hair 2.5M
  • ? shorts 510k
  • ? sitting 1.1M
  • ? undersized clothes 4.4k

Meta

  • ? third-party edit 25k

Information

  • ID: 590997
  • Uploader: orz.fi »
  • Date: over 15 years ago
  • Approver: Sauced »
  • Size: 252 KB .jpg (754x675) »
  • Source:
  • Rating: Questionable
  • Score: -11
  • Favorites: 10
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days after returning to moderation queue (over 15 years ago)
This post belongs to a parent (learn more) « hide
post #260658
original drawn by go_robots
  • ‹ prev Search: downvotes:>10 status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    ter
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    OMFG!

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Tsuyuki
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Holy shi-!! O.o

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 106348
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Now thats just wrong!!!

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    tonedeff
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    AlfyMasamune said:
    Now thats just wrong!!!

    Not in Japan!

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    ShinyRayquaza
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    I like it. :)

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Letters-tan
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Poor girl must have horrible back problems.

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    solarenemy
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    What ToS would this violate?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    SBK
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    solarenemy said:
    What ToS would this violate?

    "Breasts more than twice the size of their head." It's a bullshit rule, really, because some pictures that violate it get to stay, where others don't. Not to mention that not all artists draw heads the same size, making the rule inconsistent. It's really a poorly worded rule...

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    desert rain
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    that's just the right size..

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Dixus
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    I'll be her study buddy.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    richie
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    solarenemy said:
    What ToS would this violate?

    It's a shop. Original post #260658

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Vyce
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Letters-tan said:
    Poor girl must have horrible back problems.

    Yeah, let's apply (faulty) logic to completely fictional situation.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    dopeboy917
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    faulty? no

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    reapergundam
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    now THOSE are ubertits... seriously, that should be the tag used for breasts that big...

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    WonderGremlin
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    richie said:
    It's a shop. Original post #260658

    After seeing this I somehow want her to have her flat chest again because this is just creepy ;_;

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NightChime
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    So wait. Gigantic breasts are okay if they're shaped like balloons, but if they're drawn as if they were made of fat and flesh, they're not?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Destruct
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Score: -11

    Come on, now. There's been FAR worse.

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    glasnost
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Destruct said:
    Come on, now. There's been FAR worse.

    What is it that leads people to believe this is a valid argument? "Mussolini? Sure, he was an okay guy; after all, Hitler and Stalin were FAR worse." You have to draw a line somewhere.

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Destruct
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    glasnost said:
    What is it that leads people to believe this is a valid argument? "Mussolini? Sure, he was an okay guy; after all, Hitler and Stalin were FAR worse." You have to draw a line somewhere.

    ಠ_ಠ

    I don't know what lead you to believe my statement was worth Godwin'ing up this discussion.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    glasnost
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Oh, heavens, I broke an Internet law! I sure hope the Internet police don't find out!

    Here, have a few more metaphors which might not offend your delicate sensibilities:

    "Got mugged, y'say? Quit your bitchin', it's not like he shot you or anything!"

    "Sprained ankle? Is your leg broken? No? Take a lap!"

    "Shoplifting? Hell, no, I won't testify to give you an alibi! Go get arrested for a real crime, like murder, then we'll talk!"

    Also, Godwin's Law (a.k.a. reductio ad Hitlerum) requires actually comparing someone to Hitler, not just saying his name.

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Destruct
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    glasnost said:
    Oh, heavens, I broke an Internet law! I sure hope the Internet police don't find out!

    Here, have a few more metaphors which might not offend your delicate sensibilities:

    "Got mugged, y'say? Quit your bitchin', it's not like he shot you or anything!"

    "Sprained ankle? Is your leg broken? No? Take a lap!"

    "Shoplifting? Hell, no, I won't testify to give you an alibi! Go get arrested for a real crime, like murder, then we'll talk!"

    Also, Godwin's Law (a.k.a. reductio ad Hitlerum) requires actually comparing someone to Hitler, not just saying his name.

    Oh, don't be so silly. You just proved with your other metaphors that you could have handled that situation much better, but instead you chose to make a huge ass out of yourself over something that really wasn't worth it anyway.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    glasnost
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    I dunno, I don't think I made a huge ass of myself. I was right; that counts for something, doesn't it?

    I am, however, making a huge ass of myself by continuing to comment on this post. I can only hope that it's deleted soon, forever banishing my secret shame into the annals of Danbooru history.

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /