Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? nattou (pixiv111452963) 3

Copyrights

  • ? pokemon 387k
  • ? ↳ pokemon ruby/sapphire/emerald 5.3k

Character

  • ? may (pokemon) 8.5k

General

  • ? 1girl 8.0M
  • ? :o 254k
  • ? arms up 251k
  • ? bandana 32k
  • ? bike shorts 62k
  • ? black socks 142k
  • ? blue eyes 2.4M
  • ? blue panties 31k
  • ? blue shorts 64k
  • ? blush 3.9M
  • ? bound 105k
  • ? bound wrists 28k
  • ? breasts 4.7M
  • ? brown hair 2.0M
  • ? chain 136k
  • ? cuffs 42k
  • ? dungeon 1.2k
  • ? dutch angle 155k
  • ? forced orgasm 2.3k
  • ? handcuffs 16k
  • ? hitachi magic wand 4.5k
  • ? indoors 522k
  • ? looking at viewer 4.6M
  • ? m legs 16k
  • ? medium breasts 1.2M
  • ? medium hair 593k
  • ? nipples 1.1M
  • ? open mouth 3.3M
  • ? orgasm 24k
  • ? panties 793k
  • ? raised eyebrows 42k
  • ? rape 45k
  • ? red bandana 5.9k
  • ? red shirt 104k
  • ? sex toy 70k
  • ? shiny skin 152k
  • ? shirt 2.7M
  • ? shorts 623k
  • ? socks 550k
  • ? solo focus 477k
  • ? spread legs 334k
  • ? stone wall 3.1k
  • ? sweat 727k
  • ? tongue 528k
  • ? torn bike shorts 1.0k
  • ? torn clothes 201k
  • ? torn shirt 16k
  • ? underwear 981k
  • ? vibrator 30k

Meta

  • ? ai-generated 16k
  • ? commentary request 6.1M
  • ? highres 7.7M
  • ? ↳ absurdres 2.8M

Information

  • ID: 8650765
  • Uploader: Benit149 »
  • Date: over 1 year ago
  • Size: 4.62 MB .png (3853x2170) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/125687315 »
  • Rating: Explicit
  • Score: 23
  • Favorites: 25
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days (over 1 year ago)
Resized to 22% of original (view original)
may (pokemon and 1 more) drawn by nattou_(pixiv111452963)

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 電動マッサージ

    • ‹ prev Search: status:any next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Carmilla555
    over 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    This looks like AI, like the rest of nattou's pictures

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Jerl
    over 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    I dunno about that. I went through all of their art and didn't find any AI artifacts, not even ones from upscaling. I've also never seen an AI successfully generate chains like this image has. If this is AI at all, it's AI-assisted.

    Basing accusations of AI on the style is how you make false accusations. Lots of human artists have been creating artwork that looks very similar to what AI generates since before AI-generated images were even a thing.

    3 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    cd young
    over 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    "Art is too clean, must be AI."
    This is the world we're in now.

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Cort321
    over 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    Ok, what about her left (our right) toes?

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    marcymal
    over 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    The growth on the left foot, the thin right leg, the cordless corded wand, and the thumbless right hand are all suspicious. At the same time, the resolution would not be possible with a machine since their resolutions are always divisible by 8, unless the artist was upscaling at a real weird multiplier. Also the background is almost certainly manmade, a machine would have messed up the size of the bricks. I believe the artist made the background themselves and then pasted in the output of a machine, which would technically make this assisted, though I would ask who was doing the assisting here.

    Updated by marcymal over 1 year ago

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Jerl
    over 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    Cort321 said:

    Ok, what about her left (our right) toes?

    Human artists were bad at drawing feet way before AI was bad at drawing feet. That looks like a normal poorly-drawn foot. 5 toes, with the small toe for some reason at an angle so that you can see the second section.

    I don't see a thin right leg. I see a calf partially blocking view of a thigh. I guess that the calf is slightly thin, but not nearly enough to be suspicious of.

    Disembodied hands, heads, penises, etc are a very common thing. Magic wands with only part of the cord drawn are not an unheard of thing, and there are plenty of posts like that which are over a decade old.

    It is far more likely that a human made these "errors" than that an AI managed to draw the chains at the top of the image.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    B17Bomber
    over 1 year ago
    [hidden]

    Jerl said:

    Human artists were bad at drawing feet way before AI was bad at drawing feet. That looks like a normal poorly-drawn foot. 5 toes, with the small toe for some reason at an angle so that you can see the second section.

    I don't see a thin right leg. I see a calf partially blocking view of a thigh. I guess that the calf is slightly thin, but not nearly enough to be suspicious of.

    Disembodied hands, heads, penises, etc are a very common thing. Magic wands with only part of the cord drawn are not an unheard of thing, and there are plenty of posts like that which are over a decade old.

    It is far more likely that a human made these "errors" than that an AI managed to draw the chains at the top of the image.

    Now that it's been confirmed AI i think we just gotta admit that these prompters are getting better enough to fool us or that they touch up their art enough to hide the biggest artifacts. Probably a combination of both

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link

    Leave a comment

    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /