Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? nattou (pixiv111452963) 2

Copyrights

  • ? pokemon 310k
  • ? ↳ pokemon rse 4.8k

Character

  • ? may (pokemon) 7.6k

General

  • ? 1girl 6.8M
  • ? :o 209k
  • ? arms up 212k
  • ? bandana 26k
  • ? bike shorts 55k
  • ? black socks 119k
  • ? blue eyes 2.0M
  • ? blue panties 26k
  • ? blue shorts 51k
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? bound 87k
  • ? bound wrists 22k
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? brown hair 1.7M
  • ? chain 116k
  • ? cuffs 36k
  • ? dungeon 1.0k
  • ? dutch angle 132k
  • ? forced orgasm 1.6k
  • ? handcuffs 14k
  • ? hitachi magic wand 3.5k
  • ? indoors 425k
  • ? looking at viewer 3.8M
  • ? m legs 13k
  • ? medium breasts 985k
  • ? medium hair 459k
  • ? nipples 924k
  • ? open mouth 2.7M
  • ? panties 703k
  • ? raised eyebrows 38k
  • ? rape 34k
  • ? red bandana 4.6k
  • ? red shirt 84k
  • ? sex toy 58k
  • ? shiny skin 135k
  • ? shirt 2.2M
  • ? shorts 514k
  • ? socks 456k
  • ? solo focus 400k
  • ? spread legs 284k
  • ? stone wall 2.6k
  • ? sweat 598k
  • ? tongue 437k
  • ? torn bike shorts 909
  • ? torn clothes 166k
  • ? torn shirt 12k
  • ? underwear 865k
  • ? vibrator 25k

Meta

  • ? ai-generated 10k
  • ? highres 6.2M
  • ? ↳ absurdres 2.2M

Information

  • ID: 8650765
  • Uploader: Benit149 »
  • Date: 7 months ago
  • Size: 4.62 MB .png (3853x2170) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/125687315 »
  • Rating: Explicit
  • Score: 22
  • Favorites: 24
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days (7 months ago)
Resized to 22% of original (view original)
may (pokemon and 1 more) drawn by nattou_(pixiv111452963)

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 電動マッサージ

    • ‹ prev Search: dungeon status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Carmilla555
    7 months ago
    [hidden]

    This looks like AI, like the rest of nattou's pictures

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Jerl
    7 months ago
    [hidden]

    I dunno about that. I went through all of their art and didn't find any AI artifacts, not even ones from upscaling. I've also never seen an AI successfully generate chains like this image has. If this is AI at all, it's AI-assisted.

    Basing accusations of AI on the style is how you make false accusations. Lots of human artists have been creating artwork that looks very similar to what AI generates since before AI-generated images were even a thing.

    3 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    cd young
    7 months ago
    [hidden]

    "Art is too clean, must be AI."
    This is the world we're in now.

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Cort321
    7 months ago
    [hidden]

    Ok, what about her left (our right) toes?

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    marcymal
    7 months ago
    [hidden]

    The growth on the left foot, the thin right leg, the cordless corded wand, and the thumbless right hand are all suspicious. At the same time, the resolution would not be possible with a machine since their resolutions are always divisible by 8, unless the artist was upscaling at a real weird multiplier. Also the background is almost certainly manmade, a machine would have messed up the size of the bricks. I believe the artist made the background themselves and then pasted in the output of a machine, which would technically make this assisted, though I would ask who was doing the assisting here.

    Updated by marcymal 7 months ago

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Jerl
    7 months ago
    [hidden]

    Cort321 said:

    Ok, what about her left (our right) toes?

    Human artists were bad at drawing feet way before AI was bad at drawing feet. That looks like a normal poorly-drawn foot. 5 toes, with the small toe for some reason at an angle so that you can see the second section.

    I don't see a thin right leg. I see a calf partially blocking view of a thigh. I guess that the calf is slightly thin, but not nearly enough to be suspicious of.

    Disembodied hands, heads, penises, etc are a very common thing. Magic wands with only part of the cord drawn are not an unheard of thing, and there are plenty of posts like that which are over a decade old.

    It is far more likely that a human made these "errors" than that an AI managed to draw the chains at the top of the image.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    B17Bomber
    7 months ago
    [hidden]

    Jerl said:

    Human artists were bad at drawing feet way before AI was bad at drawing feet. That looks like a normal poorly-drawn foot. 5 toes, with the small toe for some reason at an angle so that you can see the second section.

    I don't see a thin right leg. I see a calf partially blocking view of a thigh. I guess that the calf is slightly thin, but not nearly enough to be suspicious of.

    Disembodied hands, heads, penises, etc are a very common thing. Magic wands with only part of the cord drawn are not an unheard of thing, and there are plenty of posts like that which are over a decade old.

    It is far more likely that a human made these "errors" than that an AI managed to draw the chains at the top of the image.

    Now that it's been confirmed AI i think we just gotta admit that these prompters are getting better enough to fool us or that they touch up their art enough to hide the biggest artifacts. Probably a combination of both

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /