It's kinda pathetic that so many people can't even tell this obvious AI in this kind of database. And then they call out witch hunts against those who can spot it. That ONLY timelapse is something any artist would immediately recognize as extremely off. No wonder so many AI artists are popping up like this.

Yeah really weird timelapse that had lots of inconsistencies that makes them just look less trustworthy in addition to several other things. I don't think this guy feels very open-and-shut though so I get why people are stuck on it. They definitely have a lot of cleanup work involved.

gjj said:

It's kinda pathetic that...

...You just adding ai-generated tag to 'obvious AI'.
First of all, ai-generated art isn't allowed. You should FLAG it if it was approved, not just tag it.
Second, you should be aware that ai-assisted art is allowed.
Third, if you're not sure and you don't have solid arguments if the art is ai-generated or not, you should go to topic #22285 and ask there.
Fourth: more sense, less insults. You know, people REALLY like when somebody calling them pathetic. If you want people to listen to you, look at your comment #2298829 and learn from yourself.

I'm removing the ai-generated tags on this artists' work. They have a history as a free-lancer who worked commercially and have a strict no-ai stance on their pixiv. I'm inclined to trust them, and their work does not appear to me to be ai-generated.

I mean, they don't 'have a history' of working anywhere. History is when events are recorded and passed down. This is just something they wrote in their bio online, it doesn't mean anything on its own. People on the internet can make things up.

It's pretty obvious this isn't AI-generated or assisted, the work is missing the unmistakable AI sheen, There are no anatomical inconsistencies, no poorly defined details, no meshing of different patterns. and you can see the sketch lines if you look.

And some people are right to call witch hunts since any art that is even remotely cleaned or touched up to look less like a rough sketch are almost immediately suspected of being AI derived in anyway.

The only part I find concerning for a moment is the crossed bangs because some AI does it ridiculously often far and beyond reasonable measure. (Also, how tightly the bra digs into her flanks.) There's no reason to fault it here, however, as that's close to how Noel's hair looks officially; and, I see nothing else off about the image.

The bio reminds me that someone here mentioned that a number of AI accounts using a formulaic fake bio that followed the pattern "retired/fired from company; do not used for training and does not use ai", in bullet points. This is just me repeating what someone else here said and I have no way of validating their accusation or tying it to this account beyond coincidence. What company does this bio mention anyway? my translation software says "V-Official".

There is a making-of video of at least one of artist's posts. I don't think AI is able to produce this kind of videos yet.
https://x.com/MasaShirrai/status/1882701840367943830

FJH said:

What company does this bio mention anyway? my translation software says "V-Official".

V事務所 just means vtuber corpo, they're not naming any specific one because it doesn't exist, I wrote more about it in forum #335680.

It's funny to me that every imperfection is now "proof" of AI use.
The witch hunt is doing more harm than the scripts ever could.

zetgeist said:

It's funny to me that every imperfection is now "proof" of AI use.
The witch hunt is doing more harm than the scripts ever could.

I didn't know The Scripts made anything about witch hunting.