I know you're supposed to tag what you see, but bondage? BDSM? Really? Even if you don't know the context, is that really what this looks like?

Steak said:
I know you're supposed to tag what you see, but bondage? BDSM? Really? Even if you don't know the context, is that really what this looks like?

It was probably tagged bondage as in slavery, which implicates bdsm.

OOZ662 said:
It was probably tagged bondage as in slavery, which implicates bdsm.

I'd stress keeping bondage, but this isn't a sign of bdsm. The context of this pic has little to do with slavery.

GMO said:
I'd stress keeping bondage, but this isn't a sign of bdsm. The context of this pic has little to do with slavery.

Unless the implication is undone it can't be removed. But I'm not even sure it is implicated any more since the alias/implication search buttons seem to have been axed and I don't have time to mess with it at the moment.

EDIT: Nope, implication's still there. Also note that the possibly more fitting word of "bound" is aliased to bondage.

GMO said:
I'd stress keeping bondage, but this isn't a sign of bdsm. The context of this pic has little to do with slavery.

...and even less with "purposeful physical restraint of a person" as is bondage defined here.
In anime this leg bracelet has only magical and decorative purposes and she wears it of her own free will. A memento to her past, when she was forcibly shackled as a slave.

Maybe the shackle is better here?. Maybe I could add tied_up too but I don't think that's the same thing.