Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? ibaraki shun 187

Copyright

  • ? original 1.5M

Character

  • ? catyla veree (ohman) 37

General

  • ? 1girl 7.8M
  • ? bikini 639k
  • ? black bikini 149k
  • ? black hair 2.0M
  • ? blue eyes 2.3M
  • ? bracelet 250k
  • ? breasts 4.6M
  • ? day 427k
  • ? dutch angle 151k
  • ? hair between eyes 1.6M
  • ? jewelry 1.5M
  • ? looking at viewer 4.5M
  • ? multicolored bikini 10.0k
  • ? multicolored hair 1.1M
  • ? navel 1.5M
  • ? one eye closed 573k
  • ? open mouth 3.2M
  • ? outdoors 734k
  • ? red bikini 42k
  • ? red hair 684k
  • ? see-through clothes 201k
  • ? shirt 2.7M
  • ? short hair 2.9M
  • ? solo 6.5M
  • ? standing 1.2M
  • ? swimsuit 839k
  • ? teeth 708k
  • ? tied shirt 19k
  • ? tongue 514k
  • ? tongue out 386k
  • ? two-tone bikini 6.3k
  • ? two-tone hair 364k
  • ? wading 52k
  • ? water 271k
  • ? wet 182k
  • ? wet clothes 58k
  • ? wet shirt 20k

Meta

  • ? commentary request 5.9M
  • ? commission 301k
  • ? ↳ skeb commission 102k
  • ? highres 7.4M
  • ? ↳ absurdres 2.7M

Information

  • ID: 6384949
  • Uploader: SciFi »
  • Date: almost 3 years ago
  • Approver: nonamethanks »
  • Size: 1.41 MB .jpg (1771x2508) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/108856744 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 48
  • Favorites: 47
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 47% of original (view original)
catyla veree (original) drawn by ibaraki_shun

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • Skebまとめ

    リクエストありがとうございました!
    https://skeb.jp/@ibaraki_shun

    • ‹ prev Search: status:any next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    house martell
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    AI generated

    -5 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Stelle
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    house_martell said:

    AI generated

    Proof?

    6 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    ion288
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    Her ear and right hand has AI errors. The torso is overly long and thigh gap is exaggerated, common human errors, but still errors.

    4 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 63619
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    ion288 said:

    Her ear and right hand has AI errors. The torso is overly long and thigh gap is exaggerated, common human errors, but still errors.

    I don't see any AI errors in the hands. The only hand error I see is a slight mismatched size in the hands. The ear is messed up, but could just be a human error. If this is AI generated, this coloring is very poorly generated.

    As for the long torso, it's consistent with the artist other stuff, as is the coloring style.

    Updated by user 63619 almost 3 years ago

    3 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    CitrusC
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    Agemmata said:

    I don't see any AI errors in the hands. The only hand error I see is a slight mismatched size in the hands. The ear is messed up, but could just be a human error. If this is AI generated, this coloring is very poorly generated.

    As for the long torso, it's consistent with the artist other stuff as is the coloring style.

    dude, the fingers are uneven as hell. Index tip is shown for no reason while the finger itself isn't jutting out while curled The pinky has a narrower base than the tip.

    It's nonsensically drawn if the person used a reference, and it's too unreasonably uneven if they just did it blind. It's totally AI

    -2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 63619
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    CitrusC said:

    dude, the fingers are uneven as hell. Index tip is shown for no reason while the finger itself isn't jutting out while curled The pinky has a narrower base than the tip.

    It's nonsensically drawn if the person used a reference, and it's too unreasonably uneven if they just did it blind. It's totally AI

    The fingers look about where they should be. You're assuming they even used a reference at all, which most people don't. Even if they did, you're assuming artist are able to draw what they see 1 to 1. Not to mention someone is able to find a reference of the hand in the exact angle and pose they want. Maybe they used the 3D model in Clip Studio, which isn't anatomically accurate.

    The quality of the hands are pretty consistent with the artist's other stuff as well - which is it's about right but not totally anatomically accurate, which is about the level of hands for most artists in general. Hands are very hard to draw right. Also that isn't the Index finger's tip (assuming you're referring to the upper hand), it's the second joint. The artist made it a bit sharp, sure, but it's about where it should be.

    This AI witch-hunting is getting ridiculous. It's getting to point where people that makes slight improvements on their usual stuff gets "AI" label thrown at them. Mistakes != AI.

    Updated by user 63619 almost 3 years ago

    7 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    25021296
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    I checked the artist's twitter to see if he had any "making-of"s: https://twitter.com/ibaraki_shun/status/1516053679782080521
    It's from a year back, the artist seems to have a hard time with hands.

    3 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    CitrusC
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    Agemmata said:

    The fingers look about where they should be.

    I want you to assume the same hand position as the image or go to a doctor. Because it's either your eyes or your fingers that are mangled.
    index and ring fingers are roughly equal in length. If they have the same bend at the knuckle, then none or both of their fingernails would be exposed.
    Ring and middle finger also does not have extra joints. If the person actually was just incompetent at finger drawing, the fingers would be parallel sausage links, not a various degrees of bends and nails that keep at the same knuckle bend. Doubly so if it's not using a reference since it keeps the image clean and the detail not distracting.
    If you want to say that it's not AI and defend it do what you must, but for the love of god, don't verify anatomical correctness if you don't know the anatomy.

    -3 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    [deleted]
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    [deleted]

    Deleted by user 63619 almost 3 years ago

    nonamethanks
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    Given the resemblance to ears in other posts like post #6184736 which are obviously not ai-generated, I'm going to assume this one is not either.

    4 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link

    Leave a comment

    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /