Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? chikuzen1996 146

Copyright

  • ? touhou 1.0M

Character

  • ? himekaidou hatate 8.6k

General

  • ? 1girl 7.8M
  • ? black skirt 425k
  • ? blush 3.8M
  • ? breasts 4.6M
  • ? brown eyes 1.0M
  • ? brown hair 1.9M
  • ? checkered clothes 26k
  • ? checkered skirt 6.3k
  • ? convenient hair 11k
  • ? looking at viewer 4.5M
  • ? navel 1.5M
  • ? one eye closed 573k
  • ? open mouth 3.2M
  • ? pillow 190k
  • ? pink skirt 60k
  • ? selfie 29k
  • ? skirt 2.0M
  • ? small breasts 658k
  • ? solo 6.5M
  • ? topless female 84k
  • ? two-tone skirt 7.8k

Meta

  • ? ai-assisted 6.8k
  • ? commentary request 5.9M
  • ? highres 7.4M

Information

  • ID: 7894777
  • Uploader: Below273 »
  • Date: almost 2 years ago
  • Size: 442 KB .jpg (1125x1325) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/120795230 »
  • Rating: Questionable
  • Score: 77
  • Favorites: 72
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 75% of original (view original)
himekaidou hatate (touhou) drawn by chikuzen1996

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 自撮りはたてたん

    新聞の購読者を増やすために一肌脱ぐはたてたん

    • ‹ prev Search: status:any next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    tremolo measure
    almost 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    i amost sure its AI, The pattern on the skirt is illogical.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    marcymal
    almost 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    And the arms are uneven. And the hair ribbons have that "smudginess" that happens when the machine makes accessories. And the blue pillow's shape is suspect. And that yellow thing in the upper-right corner looks like a classic machine artifact. And the inexplicable plus-shaped shadow on the midriff.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    almost 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    marcymal said:

    And that yellow thing in the upper-right corner looks like a classic machine artifact.

    I can't speak for the rest of the image but that's her camera phone.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    marcymal
    almost 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    blindVigil said:

    I can't speak for the rest of the image but that's her camera phone.

    Based on the position of her arm, that would imply that her left forearm is about as long as her right hand.
    Also, since this is supposed to be a selfie based on the commentary, we shouldn't be able to see her phone in the first place. In my experience, that's a common fumble for machines prompted to generate a selfie.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    almost 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    marcymal said:

    Based on the position of her arm, that would imply that her left forearm is about as long as her right hand.
    Also, since this is supposed to be a selfie based on the commentary, we shouldn't be able to see her phone in the first place. In my experience, that's a common fumble for machines prompted to generate a selfie.

    It's not supposed to be a selfie she's taking a selfie. I think you're just nitpicking a bunch of minor details.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    tremolo measure
    almost 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    ok, let's ignore the errors for now, this artist's previous posts were marked as ai-assisted, so I doubt this one will be the exception.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    almost 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    tremolo_measure said:

    ok, let's ignore the errors for now, this artist's previous posts were marked as ai-assisted, so I doubt this one will be the exception.

    That's a very misleading statement. Only two images from this artist are tagged ai-assisted, making them the exception not this one, and the user that did it, as far as I can find, didn't explain why or bring it up in the AI check thread.

    Correction: 5 of them were tagged ai-assisted by one user while another one was tagged ai-generated by a random member, 4 of the 6 were unapproved, and no explanation or discussion was had for any of them.

    Updated by blindVigil almost 2 years ago

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link

    Leave a comment

    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /