whilst i'm not even remotely qualified to make such statements:

Is go robot's lack of explictivity due to lack of ability on the interesting parts?

that would a. explain a lot and b. justify it entirely

Roderic said:
whilst i'm not even remotely qualified to make such statements:

Is go robot's lack of explictivity due to lack of ability on the interesting parts?

that would a. explain a lot and b. justify it entirely

By portraying the subtle architecture of human anatomy and providing a distinguishable balance between stylisation and adherence to realistic structures, go robot conveys an aesthetic style, through effective usage of emphatic line economy, plaintive and evoking compositions, and the usage of a subdued yet still vivid colour palette, which fully conveys a sense of 'explicitness'.

I hope I've done well to respond to your enquiry.

my vocabulary in the realms of art monketry is lacking, but thanks for the effort.

I think he just does what he wants to, which is just as well. Pretty sure he could do all the more naughty things if he wanted to, with what we see here.

Although the chin to the neck could use some work, and the arm seems oddly contorted for no real reason--if she was showing other signs of being plowed from off screen, it might make more sense.

Yeah, dude, I hate the "Art" folk to use long words over the small ones. What douches. If you really need to use longer words to make your subject sound interesting, you're subject is obviously boring, or you think of it as such, so why should we be listening?