Comments

the tweets lists the artist as "skrmi" but that is neither the artists username on twitter or skeb, help appreciated to properly credit the artist

Looks like https://x.com/skrmiii, added the tag.

This was an illustration of Rick Strowd for FF:COTW done by junny!
Source:
https://x.com/junny113/status/2079578671850102884
https://x.com/junny113/status/2079580305141444657

We're trapped in the belly of this horrible machine
And the machine is bleeding to death

Original video: My daughter receives her favorite Apocalyptic Post-Rock album

Like 3 seconds into the future.

Not sure why, but there are two artist tags for Tonko? Even though both Tonko & senno_aki are her aliases.

...what's wrong with your faaaaaace!?

[internal screaming]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

reference

「キターンのこの走り好きすぎて毎日真似して遊んでる」
"I love this way of running that Kittan so much that I try to imitate it every day."
「きも」
"gross"

BAKUSHIN CARES NOT FROM WHENCE THE BLOOD FLOWS

Bakushin for the Bakushin god.

I dont vibe with Nurgle Haru

all that's missing is the Horse-Emperor of Umakind Rudolf

Kamivax said in comment #2545665:

I dont vibe with Nurgle Haru

Positive reinforcement and lack of change do benefit Nurgle

"...betrayed by his son, the Horse. And the Gillman came to take their virginity away with the Coat of Stars..." - Excerpt from "Feral World Religion". Author Unknown.

Is that an AK-12 with a M4 mag 😭

John_Singleton said in comment #2616624:

Is that an AK-12 with a M4 mag 😭

I don't think it's an Ak.... Might be Daewoo K2C1.... I could be wrong.

stealth42blade said in comment #2616642:

I don't think it's an Ak.... Might be Daewoo K2C1.... I could be wrong.

Oh shi you might be right, I didnt look at the charging handle mb yall 🙏

While this style is beautiful in its own right, she just don't look like Ashley without the heavy lines and sharp angles. Here she resembles an Eskimo lady

She does NOT have any of that

Uncle Heng in another mirror world doing side quest

OiledUpBystander said in comment #2616777:

Uncle Heng in another mirror world doing side quest

Gotta leave his (prey) mark somewhere on this (or another) earth!

GolfFoxtrotLima said in comment #2589331:

Ai sucks

Everyone I've talked to that tries to defend generative AI doesn't do it from a point of intellectual honesty. They'd be like "don't be anti-tech if we don't have technology everyone will still be farmers!" instead of acknowledging the wave of media slop, disinformation campaigns, and environment destruction. They'd defend lead in gasoline or asbestos back in the days because it is new tech.

wholesomeyurienjoyer said in comment #2616679:

"everyone will still be farmers!"

Nowadays, knowing how to grow free food is infinitely more preferable than starving and living in generational debt, so them saying that like it's some kind of own is lowkey insane.

Himegami_Akane said in comment #2616685:

Nowadays, knowing how to grow free food is infinitely more preferable than starving and living in generational debt, so them saying that like it's some kind of own is lowkey insane.

Growing food actually costs a lot. Modern day farmers outside of megafarms barely break even most of the time because the cost of fertilizer inputs, seeds, equipment, etc. If we're talking about subsistence farming, yes of course that's mostly free outside of labor, but you're not going to be making much if any food surplus from it, if you have a bad harvest one year you're very likely to starve and you don't have the amenities of being connected to the grid like being able to shitpost in anime art database comments.

Being a farmer has never been a good job. Even now either you own your own land and are at constant risk of losing it because you don't make any money, or you're grinding for someone else and you're still a wagie in a cagie (and will probably be replaced by an undocumented immigrant who the owner can pay less and deport if they complain). It is not preferable and if you're living a service job or office job you actually have it quite easy in comparison contrary to whatever idealized idyllic image of working on the land you might have.

wholesomeyurienjoyer said in comment #2616679:
instead of acknowledging the wave of media slop, disinformation campaigns, and environment destruction

Let's make this less of a straw man:
I will absolutely acknowledge the slob, though that slob can be fun to mess around with.
And as for environmental destruction, I will acknowledge the increased demand for those rare earths you hear so much about and water use, and that these things cause pollution. But I don't think the man-caused climate change narrative has been honest science.
And the disinformation campaigns - propaganda - were there long before and it was far more difficult to question before technologies such as books and internet. Depending on how you use AI it seems like a good tool against it: Use AI from different presumed biases, check the sources and compare with other people, right? And for less politically invested topics it seems even better. Of course, that's depending on using AI properly. Now, after consulting an AI, I'll also acknowledge that if the legwork isn't done, AI generated falsehoods might make people more skeptical of everything they see and hear, and so it may in effect simply reinforce tribal beliefs because people retreat to that. But this is a case of AI having challenged my previous position, from which we can further discuss, making this point somewhat ironic.

Whether there are negative effects from AI is not a question. The real question to ask is whether AI is more useful than it's harmful. I personally find it to be a very useful learning tool (to supplement other tools). On the whole I think it's too soon to make an evaluation, but if I had to based on things right now, I'd rather have it just for how useful it is and because the negatives don't seem to have affected me much. You can make the same allegations against books, and I'd make the same conclusion based on similar reasoning.

But I don't think the man-caused climate change narrative has been honest science.

I was going to respectfully reply until you start doubting human-caused climate change. Sigh. Its always people you most expect that defends AI.

Not gonna keep replying on this art because its not going anywhere, especially since with genAI everybody thinks they are winning an argument. "ChatGPT, generate me 7 reasons why climate change is not real so I can win this online argument despite almost every reputable scientist saying otherwise". Lets just enjoy art.

wholesomeyurienjoyer said in comment #2616752:
Its always people you most expect that defends AI.

What does that mean and does it amount to anything more than the usual ad hominem thinking?

Not gonna keep replying on this art because its not going anywhere,

They say technology has created echo chambers, but it seems very much voluntary.

especially since with genAI everybody thinks they are winning an argument.

Straw manning, and right after I had used AI to challenge my own assumptions.

"ChatGPT, generate me 7 reasons why climate change is not real

Putting words in my mouth. I specifically never said climate change wasn't real.

Lets just enjoy art.

First you talk trash about everyone not opposed to AI, and then when you get a little pushback you run away refusing to engage, and then have the temerity to end it with an appeal to keep it focused on the art on this site.

It's slimy.

Son🥀🥀

Very sexy. They should get in bed together.

Her legs have a bit too much details.

moje said in comment #2616756:

Her legs have a bit too much details.

Gonna have more muscles to counterbalance those two huge mass.