Posted under General
Runty said:
Lemme guess: "Too Western"? It's still an excellent Rosaria artwork. Besides, Western artworks of anime characters aren't innately forbidden.
For instance, post #4635978 looks Western and it was still readily accepted by Qpax.
The hand is kinda weird but it's accepted now
I hope I'm not in spamming territory for mentioning this again, but I still had no closure for post #4620993 (nsfw)
Is it the hands and face? I had a streak of accepted uploads from the artist (and also some of the same exact OC) and this was the exception.
Personally, I find the art decent enough to be safely above borderline/debatable quality, and probably one of the better ones compared to the approved works of the same artist maanii. It does involve a pee fetish but this tag has 6.4k posts so I don't think this is too obscure or extreme.
Thanks in advance for any input.
What's wrong with the post #4646919 and co?
post #4646128 My first post to not get approved, there are also 3 others I made which seem like they wont be approved either. I Don't see what is wrong with them? "It has been reviewed by 10 approvers. 1 believe it has poor quality. 9 did not like the post enough to approve it." What exactly is the issue so I don't upload similar images
fantomă said:
post #4646128 My first post to not get approved, there are also 3 others I made which seem like they wont be approved either. I Don't see what is wrong with them? "It has been reviewed by 10 approvers. 1 believe it has poor quality. 9 did not like the post enough to approve it." What exactly is the issue so I don't upload similar images
Look at the real photos. With her anatomy, it is doubtful to be alive, so I see.
fantomă said:
post #4646128 My first post to not get approved, there are also 3 others I made which seem like they wont be approved either. I Don't see what is wrong with them? "It has been reviewed by 10 approvers. 1 believe it has poor quality. 9 did not like the post enough to approve it." What exactly is the issue so I don't upload similar images
Ridiculous anatomy any nothing else to make up for that.
Good morning, my post #4654967 was deleted due to "poor quality" and "nightmare fuel", can I please get a real reason why it got deleted? It just doesn't make sense.
Uploading your own art to danbooru is discouraged, see howto:upload. In this specific case, her face looks really really bad, which kinda reminds me of post #156522.
To get a better grip of the art you uploaded and what's acceptable on danbooru, you can easily compare that image with any other on the site. In future cases you should upload your own art to sites like DeviantArt or Pixiv.
Guaro said:
Uploading your own art to danbooru is discouraged, see howto:upload. In this specific case, her face looks really really bad, which kinda reminds me of post #156522.
To get a better grip of the art you uploaded and what's acceptable on danbooru, you can easily compare that image with any other on the site. In future cases you should upload your own art to sites like DeviantArt or Pixiv.
Hm that is fair, thanks for explaining in details. I'll make more acceptable posts in the future.
I'm wondering about a few pictures from this artist which failed to be approved and I'm not sure why, since they seem to be just as good quality as their other works which are regularly approved.
post #4248508
post #4264775
post #4015134 (this one is part of a set)
post #4406487 (this one has a companion piece)
post #4516946 and post #4516948
post #3312569
Veradux said:
Post count for jcm2 status:active: 363
Post count for jcm2 approver:none status:active: 258The most recent image from that artist to pass the queue was two months ago.
Fair, but the images I was wondering about don't seem any worse than those that have passed the queue. Just would like some feedback about them.
Updated by clamz
Why was post #4651617 deleted? I thought uploading higher resolution publicly available versions of existing posts was encouraged? If the source field was suspicious, know that the mega link was publicly tweeted by the artist in [1].
Krabbyos said:
Why was post #4651617 deleted? I thought uploading higher resolution publicly available versions of existing posts was encouraged? If the source field was suspicious, know that the mega link was publicly tweeted by the artist in [1].
Status: Active
Previous: Unapproved in three days.
It happens that work is missed. I think it was an accidental carelessness when checking.
post #4654216 - Not sure what's wrong with it. If it's just due to how her foot is drawn, that's a poor excuse to reject it.
post #4654033 - Bad anatomy?
Updated by Runty
what exactly is wrong with these
post #4524996
post #4524998 ?
especially also these
post #4610704
post #4614124
post #4617589
post #4657888
The last one I posted had some quality issues, and I'll readily admit that. But this one is more baffling.
It's identical to its companion pic which was readily accepted within three minutes of posting, except with the tits still tucked into the dress shirt. So it couldn't be a quality issue.
