I'm curious as to why post #5949730 was not approved. It's the same quality as the artist's other works that were approved and i've seen photographs of sketchbooks like this be approved before as well.
Posted under General
I'm curious as to why post #5949730 was not approved. It's the same quality as the artist's other works that were approved and i've seen photographs of sketchbooks like this be approved before as well.
coolyo294 said:
It's the same quality as the artist's other works that were approved
Nah, that's definitely less polished than post #5944086
I'm still wondering why my appeals failed for post #4585201 and post #5846247. I had finally properly sourced the latter and I do not see much wrong with the former.
NYALurker said:
I'm still wondering why my appeals failed for post #4585201 and post #5846247. I had finally properly sourced the latter and I do not see much wrong with the former.
post #4585201 might be because of that flat face. It just isnt going to appeal to a lot of approvers. post #5846247 is one of Hakugin's weakest works and just isn't good at drawing Python's face as seen in this surprisingly approved this post #4991562
post #5956071
post #5956100
post #5956167
post #5956217
Wondering why these aren't getting approved. As of writing this they have an average score of 141 with the highest having 240.
They are pretty high quality 3d animation with sound and the works, I mean the models look like they were ripped straight from the source material.
post #5953166
Was it because it was zoomed in?
skywalkerred said:
post #5953166
Was it because it was zoomed in?
That and there was already a non-cropped version of the picture. You should only ever upload duplicates if the new picture is higher quality/resolution than the old one, and never upload cropped if non-cropped is available.
Can someone pls tell me something wrong with post #5936994?
pablo.gonzales.2007 said:
Can someone pls tell me something wrong with post #5936994?
This is the third time you have linked this post, please stop spamming it.
post #5953499
Any feedback on what wasn't up to par with this one? it would help me be more selective in my uploads
Updated by Lil mari8
Unbreakable said:
This is the third time you have linked this post, please stop spamming it.
I'm sorry but how can this left unapproved for being low-quality? Is that because of badly-drawn horse, while the horse girl itself look acceptable?
World_Funeral said:
I'm sorry but how can this left unapproved for being low-quality? Is that because of badly-drawn horse, while the horse girl itself look acceptable?
well, this is the usual standard for japanese artists when they drew chibi horses, i guess.
Could post #5958087 please have another go? What's up with it?
Updated by skywalkerred
Can someone give this one another review? post #5894408
Thank you
Updated by Chimera99
May I know why these posts (post #5960609 and post #5959198 and post #5961482) were deleted? From what I see they look fine and are similar to their respective artists’ artstyles.
Updated by js 007
Just curious to know whats the problem with post #5962730 ? Its the artist's typical work and even the same artist's sketches (for example post #5628804) were accepted? The expression?
it's 2nd day but im quite worry about this upload of my, so i post here because i'm curious..thanks
post #5967908
Is there something wrong with post #5970365 ? Cause it's the same as these posts. post #5957046 post #5961827
Thank you!
Juji46 said:
Is there something wrong with post #5970365 ?
Thank you!
It's only one day in the queue. Wait until it's deleted before you ask for feedback. Not every approver has seen it so far.
Also, don't compare your uploads to other images. Images are judged and approved on their own and not in comparison to other images.