Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Unbreakable said:

They actually have a slightly different tint if you flip between both images, so they aren't pixel dupes.

I have thought same with you, and it was truth.

I have more deleted posts with the case similar with post #6116207 drawn by the same artist :

post #6260333 (mari track)
post #6004659 (arona santa)
post #6004665 (sora santa)
post #6008225 (iori)
post #6008874 (azusa track)

post #6008887 (haruna new year)
post #6008896 (fuuka new year)
post #6008902 (aris bunny)
post #6032454 (shiroko)
post #6032453 (shiroko)

post #6116253 (toki)
post #5916293 (haruna track)
post #5916432 (arona track)
post #6035937 (mika)
post #6035830 (koharu casual)

post #6035824 (miyu bunny)
post #6083261 (shiroko cycling)
post #6199580 (hina casual)
post #6201186 (natsu)
post #6202702 (arona)

post #6202703 (arona)
post #6205136 (aris)
post #6205138 (aris track)
post #6261981 (arona)
post #6032459 (shigure hot spring)

godwjdqks12 said:

I have thought same with you, and it was truth.

I have more deleted posts with the case similar with post #6116207 drawn by the same artist :

The artist uploads three steps of their work, lineart, colored and finished. If you upload them all, only the finished artwork might get approved.

post #6263927
post #5935093
post #5546696
are official Megami magazine scan yet got deleted.

post #6163191
post #5823414
also need a review for approval.

Thanks in advance guys.

Why did my latest upload (Ivy from Fire Emblem) get deleted? Was it the quality? The dimensions? It couldn't be the craft of the art itself could it?

I can't understand why these four posts are unapproved.

post #6252486

I think this post has enough quality. the message said it has a problem at kayoko's arm, but it seems well.

post #6244971

Uncolored posts by the same artist are already approved.

post #6032453
post #5812900

These two have enough image size and quality.

These seems to be good quality, any reasons why it wasn't approved?

post #6251356
post #6251361

If it the sources being problematic then I can explain, the first post comes from a game extract from someone who worked at phigros and uploaded the file to FANDOM wiki. The second post is a thumbnail of the bilibili video that is provided by the artist themselves but wasn't uploaded by them directly.

Thank you!

post #6262883

Why did this artwork got deleted?

Kneyki said:

post #6262883

Why did this artwork got deleted?

overall looks too amateurish

BG_Cypo said:

These seems to be good quality, any reasons why it wasn't approved?

post #6251356
post #6251361

If it the sources being problematic then I can explain, the first post comes from a game extract from someone who worked at phigros and uploaded the file to FANDOM wiki. The second post is a thumbnail of the bilibili video that is provided by the artist themselves but wasn't uploaded by them directly.

Thank you!

Despite being official art, they still look kinda messy with questionable composition tbh

godwjdqks12 said:

I can't understand why these four posts are unapproved.

post #6252486

I think this post has enough quality. the message said it has a problem at kayoko's arm, but it seems well.

But it's not "well" and it's not the only anatomy issue either, anatomy is overall visibly wonky

Wilfriback said:

post #6263927
post #5935093
post #5546696
are official Megami magazine scan yet got deleted.

The two other posts look fine to me, but Megami magazine art isn't always good, in my honest opinion it's even just "okay" in the best cases, and those three posts are far below other megami magazine posts i've seen, not gonna lie

Can i get feedback on why these 2 post where never approved
post #6257408
post #6254173

Oh，shit

what‘s problem of them
post #6267550
post #6267628
Your ability to appreciate is beyond comprehension

Mayhem-Chan said:

overall looks too amateurish

That was an artwork from my friend, Can I learn what looks amateurish?

Kneyki said:

That was an artwork from my friend, Can I learn what looks amateurish?

in other words the drawing clearly has the look of someone who's at the beginning of their learning process, it's not too bad but i'd be surprised if their art gets approved on here before getting better at some fundamentals like coloring (right now it looks like they're shading with simple white and black, among other things) and overall getting more used to a workflow that lets them pull stuff that looks more polished

Edit: Never mind.

Why was post #6253073 deleted? It was drawn by an established artist

post #6232517
post #6270471
post #6267550
Appeal for these three posts, I think they are good enough, the color expression composition is very good

QQWWU said:

post #6232517
post #6270471
post #6267550
Appeal for these three posts, I think they are good enough, the color expression composition is very good

To appeal a post click "Appeal" in the sidebar on the left side on the post page. This thread is for getting feedback about deleted posts, not for appealing.

post #5812900
post #6032453

Why are these two posts not approved?

They are not unfinished, and don't have any duplicate.

Maybe it’s better to ask a direct question. Will uploading images too frequently lead to a low pass rate for posts?

QQWWU said:

Maybe it’s better to ask a direct question. Will uploading images too frequently lead to a low pass rate for posts?

approval/deletion isn’t affected by frequency. you can upload an infinite number of images and if approvers like them enough they’ll be approved an infinite number of times.

BobTheBuilder_v1 said:

approval/deletion isn’t affected by frequency. you can upload an infinite number of images and if approvers like them enough they’ll be approved an infinite number of times.

OK