Posted under General
Well, if another user asked feedback about some images, I want to ask the same. I would like to request feedback on these 5 images, please:
post #6625118
post #6625742
post #6636862
post #6643612
post #6647729
(I don't know if it'll do any good, because seems that the approvers have tastes far differents than mine)
Rhaizen said:
Well, if another user asked feedback about some images, I want to ask the same. I would like to request feedback on these 5 images, please:
post #6625118
post #6625742
post #6636862
post #6643612
post #6647729(I don't know if it'll do any good, because seems that the approvers have tastes far differents than mine)
It is again a lack of quality on those, with post #6647729 being a same-size duplicate of another post from years ago, on top of the anatomy issues in it
What did the 7 mods not like about this post?
I'd also like to bring up my post #6657468 for a second opinion. This is clearly a higher-resolution solo work with an existing lower-res reference sheet set and I'm confused as to why this went unapproved.We've already had cases where similar official highres vtuber CGs (post #3604643 and post #5725844) have existing lower resolution dupes and were upped by unres and still made it past queue, while I myself have posted a couple of them (post #6638637 and post #6657349) that made it past queue.Was this simply overlooked?
Fixed. Please disregard.
Updated by ArcieA
I've just started uploading on this site. While I can understand most of my deleted posts so far as I'm learning more about the site/what's typically approved, I don't really get the following: (especially when there's similar quality art from the same artist that's approved)
post #6659467
post #6653565
post #6647436
post #6644210
post #6657833 (what is the 'poor quality' in this one? there's new art from that artist I'm debating uploading but holding off for now)
Updated by throne spl
Cumpany00 said:
I've just started uploading on this site. While I can understand most of my deleted posts so far as I'm learning more about the site/what's typically approved, I don't really get the following: (especially when there's similar quality art from the same artist that's approved)
post #6659467
post #6653565
post #6647436
post #6644210
post #6657833 (what is the 'poor quality' in this one? there's new art from that artist I'm debating uploading but holding off for now)
I would like to know. At least five images I uploaded was rejected because of "poor quality", in the opinion of the approvers.
post #6669691 got instantly deleted, I think I mistakenly added some tag that made it get instantly taken down. Could someone take a look?
tbh this site management is like half dead, so a lot of stuff doesn't get approved because there just aren't a lot of ppl being given the authority to do so. Either the site needs to increase the number of days a work has to be approved or it needs to decrease the requirements for giving that authority to users.
GracieJay said:
tbh this site management is like half dead, so a lot of stuff doesn't get approved because there just aren't a lot of ppl being given the authority to do so. Either the site needs to increase the number of days a work has to be approved or it needs to decrease the requirements for giving that authority to users.
Yes. Definitely I agree.
Cumpany00 said:
I've just started uploading on this site. While I can understand most of my deleted posts so far as I'm learning more about the site/what's typically approved, I don't really get the following: (especially when there's similar quality art from the same artist that's approved)
The breasts and neck sizes and the ass sizes for me. I can't comment on the poor quality in post #6657833 but the character's right arm looks too long for me, I checked the artist's Pixiv and I'd avoid posting their artworks until they improve their skills with perspective and anatomy.
GracieJay said:
tbh this site management is like half dead, so a lot of stuff doesn't get approved because there just aren't a lot of ppl being given the authority to do so. Either the site needs to increase the number of days a work has to be approved or it needs to decrease the requirements for giving that authority to users.
There are 50+ users with approval privileges, some more active than others. At least 10 usually review one of the 1k+ posts in the queue with disinterest or something else, but the number of approvers that see a post is probably higher. Normal appeals aside, there's a great approver that usually looks after posts that are seen by a small amount of people in three days, regardless of their content, thus increasing the number of days the images stay in the queue. Posts can also be undeleted without being appealed.
Not mine, but I was wondering if this got overlooked. The artist's drawings seem okay to me.
Hullo, generous mods and approvers
I'm trying to upload Phoebus' set of Mass Effect girls but this was not approved a long while ago. Is it possible to approve it to complete the set, so to say?
Might there be any feedback for post #6659500? Thanks.
What's wrong with this image?
Rhaizen said:
What's wrong with this image?
It's a duplicate of post #4094696 from three years ago.
Please delete
post #6676256
post #6676258
Any idea what could be wrong with post #6659531? I'm not seeing any glaring flaws.
